There is no harm in taking Kate's advice to heart - they also do care, you may perceive a complete lack of care through their legal wrangling and maneuverings and I wouldn't suggest anyone there is a "warm heart" about these issues - but just like Security issues and Linux before, they care because the sysadmins and cloud architects of tomorrow care - and Microsoft needs them (just like a period before when concerns about Office licensing waiving).
Targeting the Board, major journalists, major Fortune 100 companies that use the services - it's all sound and worthwhile and costs nothing. Worst case, nothing changes - everything from there is an improvement. -Ali On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:46 AM, André Rebentisch <[email protected]>wrote: > Am 17.01.2013 15:31, schrieb Maxim Kammerer: > > Could you please be more specific? > Hiring the worst "tobaccos", disrespectful communication about > competition authorities, mass-taking over standard committees by ISV, > unreasonable communication, undue interference in non-domestic nations, > bullying tactics. > > Just take DCI as an example. > http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=DCI_Group > It became wider known to a general audience when the McCain campaign was > alluded to their lobbying for Burma. > > --- A > > > -- > Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech >
-- Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
