Reply-to-poster.
Cheers, On 21/03/13 01:17 , Yosem Companys wrote: > Dear Liberationtech list subscribers, > > Several of you have petitioned to change Liberationtech mailing list's > default "reply to" option from "reply-to-all" to "reply-to-poster." > Given the debate (see links below), we have decided to put the issue > up for a vote: > > * Do you want replies to Liberationtech list messages directed to > "reply-to-all" or "reply-to-poster"? > > Please vote by submitting your preference to me by 11.59 pm PST > on Sunday, March 24, 2013. Any votes received after this date and > time will not be counted. > > Thanks, > > Yosem > One of your moderators > > PS To read a summary of the advantages and disadvantages of > "reply-to-all", click on the corresponding links below: > > * Reply-to-all considered > useful: http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html > * Reply-to-all considered > harmful: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > If you'd like to read the entire debate on the Liberationtech list, > please click on the links below: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03767.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03768.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03769.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03771.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03772.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03773.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03774.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03775.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03776.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03777.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03778.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03779.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03780.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03781.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03782.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03783.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03788.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03789.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03790.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03791.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03799.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03801.html > > > > -- > Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by > emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech -- Guilherme Andrade
-- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
