As a political scientist: boooo. As a international relations guy: uh, okay.
I am continually amazed that people continue to forget that STEM is embedded in a social, culture, economic, and yes, political context. Chris R. Albon ChrisRAlbon.com (http://ChrisRAlbon.com) On Thursday, March 21, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Yosem Companys wrote: > > WASHINGTON, March 20, 2013 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The following is being > released by the American Political Science Association > (http://www.apsanet.org/index.cfm): > > > (Logo: http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20120604/DC18511LOGO-b ) > > > This afternoon, the United States Senate delivered a devastating blow to the > integrity of the scientific process at the National Science Foundation (NSF) > by voting for the Coburn Amendment to the Continuing Appropriations Act of > 2013. > > > Senator Coburn (R-OK) submitted an amendment (SA 65, as modified) to the > Mikulski-Shelby Amendment (SA 26) to H.R. 933 (Full-Year Continuing > Appropriations Act of 2013). The amendment places unprecedented restriction > on the national research agenda by declaring the political science study of > democracy and public policy out of bounds. The amendment allows only > political science research that promotes "national security or the economic > interests of the United States." > > > Adoption of this amendment is a gross intrusion into the widely-respected, > independent scholarly agenda setting process at NSF that has supported our > world-class national science enterprise for over sixty years. > > > The amendment creates an exceptionally dangerous slippery slope. While > political science research is most immediately affected, at risk is any and > all research in any and all disciplines funded by the NSF. The amendment > makes all scientific research vulnerable to the whims of political pressure. > > > Adoption of this amendment demonstrates a serious misunderstanding of the > breadth and importance of political science research for the national > interest and its integral place on the nation's interdisciplinary scientific > research agenda. > > > Singling out any one field of science is short-sighted and misguided, and > poses a serious threat to the independence and integrity of the National > Science Foundation. > > > And shackling political science within the national science agenda is a > remarkable embarrassment for the world's exemplary democracy. > > > For the latest in political science research in the news, follow us on > Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/PoliticalScienceNews) and Twitter > (http://twitter.com/PoliSciNews). > > > About the American Political Science Association > Founded in 1903, the American Political Science Association > (http://www.apsanet.org/index.cfm)is the leading professional organization > for the study of political science and serves more than 15,000 members in > over 80 countries. With a range of programs and services for individuals, > departments and institutions, APSA brings together political scientists from > all fields of inquiry, regions, and occupational endeavors within and outside > academe in order to expand awareness and understanding of politics. > > > > > > SOURCE American Political Science Association > > > > RELATED LINKS > http://www.apsanet.org (http://www.apsanet.org/) > -- > Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by > emailing moderator at [email protected] or changing your settings at > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech > >
-- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected] or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
