Joseph Lorenzo Hall: > Two things seem particularly interesting: apparently zero requests for > content were fulfilled for Skype and the associated FAQ [1] says CALEA > (the US law that mandates intercept capability) does not apply to Skype. > That seems particularly encouraging to me. > > The FAQ is also interesting in that the non-content question mentions > "location" but then only lists state, country and ZIP code as fields > provided (I don't know how MSFT would have access to precise > geolocation, but that doesn't appear to be something they provide). Also > the NSL reporting in the FAQ is binned in terms of thousands of NSLs... > so in 2009 they report receiving 0-999 NSLs and in 2010 1000-1999 NSLs > (hard to tell if that was just one more NSL or a bunch). >
I don't agree with that reading of the report. There is likely a lot of word-smithing here - for example, Does Skype include SkypeIn and SkypeOut or just Peer to Peer video, text and storage of (other) meta-data? Does CALEA happen on the Skype side of things or on the PTSN/VoIP service side of Skype{In,Out}? My guess is the latter rather than the former. Also, note that Microsoft "Provided Guidance to Law Enforcement" - so when they say they didn't provide content, did they provide the credentials? If so, the guidance could have allowed the "Law Enforcement" to simply login and restore the account data. Or perhaps merely disclosing a key? All the best, Jacob -- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech