-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2013.05.15 21.00, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote: > While i really appreciate the "extremely high paranoid" approach > of "deaddrop", from a quick overview it seems a little bit > overkill.
Which parts of the Dead Drop architecture do you think are unnecessary for a leaking platform? E. - -- Ideas are my favorite toys. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) iF4EAREIAAYFAlGUBrMACgkQQwkE2RkM0wrwygEAkboA1zOTEPyJ/2IFiBtbQcrk /sSKGKOkkW0zILCZn2YA/A3z5/8OlpMX6V73G3Fpjo6ltIJEEiku2OxkA9f0Dyoy =3QCa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected] or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
