Hi Moritz, My subject is hardly sensationalist. The paper purports to de-anonymize hidden services, which is a big deal.
Thanks for pointing to areas of discussion — the vulnerabilities published in the paper are still major with regards to Tor Hidden Services. :/ NK On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Moritz Bartl <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Why did you pick a sensational subject like that? You know that is > hardly the case. Most of the stuff described in the paper is already > known and described in various other papers at > http://freehaven.net/anonbib/ . > > For a discussion about this paper and the already introduced > improvements and ongoing discussions see > https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2013-May/004909.html , > especially the answers by Mike Perry and Nick Mathewson. > > For am more general call to action about Hidden Services see > https://blog.torproject.org/blog/hidden-services-need-some-love from > April 22nd. > > -- > Moritz Bartl > https://www.torservers.net/ > -- > Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by > emailing moderator at [email protected] or changing your settings at > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech >
-- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected] or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
