________________________________
 >From: Eugen Leitl <[email protected]>
>To: Liberation Technologies <[email protected]>; 
>[email protected]; [email protected] 
>Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2013 8:24 AM
>Subject: Re: [liberationtech] [cryptography] NSA "breakthrough"
 

>----- Forwarded message from Danilo Gligoroski <[email protected]> 
>-----

>Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:54:04 +0200
>From: Danilo Gligoroski <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [cryptography] NSA "breakthrough"
>Organization: Department of Telematics, IME, NTNU, Trondheim
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
>Reply-To: [email protected]

>Joachim Strömbergson wrote:

>> A "breakthrough" seems to me not to be a backdoor, but either 
>> cryptanalytical progress or progress in brute force efficiency.

>In my opinion it has nothing to do with cryptography, but rather in the 
>advancements of: 
>1. Storage technology (increasing with a ratio of billions or trillions of 
>times from early 1990s)

>2. Data collecting capabilities from:
>  a. Complexity of the software that billions of users use that leaks 
>information from thousands of places (Cap'n crunch whistle phenomenon - see 
>the video from last year CRYPTO talk of Jonathan Zittrain "End of Crypto")

Why doesn't he mention free software in the entire talk?

It'd be like giving a history of obesity and never mentioning that people can 
learn to read nutritional information on the foods they buy, or pay a 
nutritionist or personal trainer they trust to read it for them and use the 
knowledge to help them lose weight.

Actually it's worse than that-- it'd be like addressing obesity without letting 
the audience know there's a machine that exists which costs
$0 that takes nutritional information listed on a package and verifies that 
it's true.  Available to anyone who can read the instructions on
the side of the machine.

-Jonathan
--
Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing 
moderator at [email protected] or changing your settings at 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

Reply via email to