On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:18:38PM +0300, Michael Azarkevich wrote: > Why settle for "strong enough"? Use the strongest options you have at your > disposal.
One-time pads are provably strong if done right, but come with considerable usability disadvantages (but are potentially worth it if people's lives are on the line). Moreover, the point was that available encryption is sufficiently strong so that it's being worked around in practice. These are not the droids you're looking for. -- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected] or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
