----- Forwarded message from [email protected] ----- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 19:34:17 -0400 (EDT) From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Security over SONET/SDH User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-21.el5.centos Reply-To: [email protected]
The sticky problem remains for any communications carrier, we are looking for a technical solution to a legal problem. I believe that if you encrypted your links sufficiently that it was impossible to siphon the wanted data from your upstream the response would be for the tapping to move down into your data center before the crypto. With CALEA requirements and the Patriot Act they could easily compel you to give them a span port prior to the crypto. Regardless of how well built our networks are internally and externally we still must obey a court order. Sam > > > --- [email protected] wrote: > From: Christopher Morrow <[email protected]> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 2:02 PM, William Allen Simpson > <[email protected]> wrote: > > :: ...in addition to everything else "What security protocols > :: are folks using to protect SONET/SDH? At what speeds?" > > : Correct. > > : But the answer appears to be: none. Not Google. Not any > : public N/ISP. > > >> would they say if they had? > ------------------------------------------- > > > Yes, especially in light of the current news regarding > internet privacy. Could you imagine the advertising > they'd be able to do to prospective customers? > > scott > ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://ativel.com http://postbiota.org AC894EC5: 38A5 5F46 A4FF 59B8 336B 47EE F46E 3489 AC89 4EC5 -- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected] or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
