On 07/01/2013 11:30 AM, Nathan of Guardian wrote:
> Like I said, this idea is early, and perhaps a futile exercise, but I
> think it is empowering to explore how easy it is for a person to modify
> the hardware of a smartphone in a privacy-enhancing way.

Sorry, I forgot to add that this is inspired by when I used to work at
Palm, and many of our U.S. federal customers would require the early
Treo cameras and bluetooth to be disabled.

+n


--
Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing 
moderator at [email protected] or changing your settings at 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

Reply via email to