Nadim Kobeissi <[email protected]> wrote: > Frederick did not call OTF a tool of US oppression, but a tool for aiding > U.S. foreign policy. I am very pleased that my project is supported by the > excellent people at OTF, but let us not kid ourselves and say that U.S. > foreign policy has nothing to do with anything. Even if foreign policy > considerations are involved, though, they are not necessarily negative or > in any way counter to the goals of developing liberation technology. But > they simply affect our landscape. > > NK
Well, sure. And I would go so far as to say that various biases within the US government has a serious negative impact when it comes to funding for important projects. Much of the non-profit grants funding in the US trickle down from the government in some fashion. (This is true well outside libtech and the leakosphere). But even if OTF is impacted by these biases, I don't believe that the projects they fund are. Which was my point. I know almost nothing about RFA's *other* projects. But I disagree with FN's statement that they are somehow "propping up US foreign policy." Just my $0.02. ~Griffin -- Just another hacker in the City of Spies. #Foucault / PGP: 0xAE792C97 / OTR: [email protected] My posts, while frequently amusing, are not representative of the thoughts of my employer.
-- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected] or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
