..on Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 01:16:46PM +0200, phryk wrote: > On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:03:55 +0200 > Axel Simon <axelsi...@axelsimon.net> wrote: > > > I understand the need for diversity, really > > Isn't the diversity in crypto especially important in the way that we > *need* different applications to do things differently so that in case > one is broken, the other applications are not affected?
Agreed. Diversity in implementation effects a kind of decentralisation here. > > The situation gives me this feeling that this is the > > moment to sell your new super-privacy-enhanced app now the market is > > sensitive to the argument and everyone is coming out of the woods to > > do so. > > That's what I thought when I saw heml.is, too… :/ One can look at is as socially productive opportunism. Cheers, -- Julian Oliver PGP B6E9FD9A http://julianoliver.com http://criticalengineering.org -- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
