Hi Zooko,
S4 looks interesting but I have a question: how exactly does it
disprove PRISM style indiscriminate surveillance? I can understand
that with client side, pre-Internet, encryption, the data that PRISM
might suck up is *useless* but I don't see how S4 proves mass,
indiscriminate surveilance isn't happening.
Forgive me if you've already answered this in your other message but I
didn't receive it and this message us the first I've seen about the
service.
Best Regards,
Anthony
--
Sent from my mobile device
On Aug 4, 2013, at 2:45 AM, "Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hello again, people of liberationtech.
Nobody replied to my missive. Perhaps it was Too Long; Didn't Read!
But I wanted to mention to you that I subsequently talked to some
young programmers at DefCon. I told them that my claim is that
LeastAuthority.com's S4 is proof against PRISM-style indiscriminate
surveillance, but not proof against targeted surveillance. They
suggested: why not call it “PRISM-proof” then? Good idea! I might
do
that.
Regards,
Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn
Founder, CEO, and Customer Support Representative
https://LeastAuthority.com
--
Liberationtech list is public and archives are searchable on Google.
Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password
by emailing moderator at [email protected] or changing your
settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
--
Liberationtech list is public and archives are searchable on Google. Too many
emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator
at [email protected] or changing your settings at
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
