On 2013-08-09, at 11:59 AM, Julien Rabier <[email protected]> wrote:
> Le 09 août - 11:48, Nadim Kobeissi a écrit : >> >> On 2013-08-09, at 11:31 AM, Ali-Reza Anghaie <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Nadim Kobeissi <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> For what it's worth, and even though I think it's pretty unlikely that >>>> Cryptocat will receive such an order, >>> *snip* >>> >>> You're right but that should provide little comfort - when they come >>> after the non-business platform libtech to cypherpunk services - they >>> don't use legal orders. It gets much worse. -Ali >> >> Well at least now they know how to shut Cryptocat down :P >> >> NK > > One good way to reduce the impact of such an order would be to call for moar > cryptocat instances. Decentralize, spread datalove, <3 > > https://github.com/cryptocat/cryptocat/wiki/Server-Deployment-Instructions > I think I'm going to try to deploy a cryptocat server in the next days and > see how it goes. +1! Awesome! Also, weren't NSLs ruled unconstitutional recently? NK > > taziden > -- > Liberationtech list is public and archives are searchable on Google. Too many > emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing > moderator at [email protected] or changing your settings at > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech -- Liberationtech list is public and archives are searchable on Google. Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected] or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
