which is why the "cover" thing wouldn't work. i'll just shut up now. sorry again, andrew
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 03:05:45PM -0300, Andrew Cooke wrote: > > oh, sorry, i had completely forgotten about that. > > so yes, ssl/tls was extended to include this, and it's becoming more widely > supported (not knowing was a pain because you couldn't supply the > terrorism.com certificate to catlovers). > > andrew > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 05:57:19PM +0000, Ben Laurie wrote: > > On 29 October 2013 17:49, andrew cooke <[email protected]> wrote: > > > people are saying that the site name is visible, but that's not strictly > > > correct. > > > > > > a server can have many names. with https, someone can see which server > > > you > > > connected to, but they don't see which name you used to do so. > > > > Yes they do: its included in the Server Name Indication extension. > > -- > > Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of > > list guidelines will get you moderated: > > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, > > change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at > > [email protected]. > > > -- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected].
