Dear LibTech

Citizen Lab has published the fourth and final report on information controls 
and the Indonesian IGF.
The post is pasted below, and can be found here:
https://citizenlab.org/2013/11/igf-2013-analysis-2013-igf-future-internet-governance-indonesia/

Cheers
Ron



IGF 2013: An Analysis of the 2013 IGF and the Future of Internet Governance in 
Indonesia (Part 4 of 4)

November 13, 2013

IGF 2013 Series of Blog Posts:

Framing post: Monitoring Information Controls During the Bali IGF
IGF 2013: An Overview of Indonesian Internet Infrastructure and Governance 
(Part 1 of 4)
IGF 2013: Analyzing Content Controls in Indonesia (Part 2 of 4)
IGF 2013: Exploring Communications Surveillance in Indonesia (Part 3 of 4)
IGF 2013: An Analysis of the 2013 IGF and the Future of Internet Governance in 
Indonesia (Part 4 of 4)
Overview

The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) brings various stakeholder groups together 
to discuss public policy issues related to the Internet. The 2013 IGF took 
place in Bali, Indonesia under the overarching theme of “Building Bridges: 
Enhancing Multistakeholder Cooperation for Growth and Sustainable Development.” 
For the country’s vibrant civil society, the IGF presented an opportunity to 
raise awareness, mobilize support, and shape the agenda as part of a 
multistakeholder process. Now that the forum has concluded, however, challenges 
remain in building out a progressive Internet governance agenda that realizes 
the right to freedom of expression and information.

A growing number of Indonesia’s 240 million population use the Internet on a 
daily basis, whether to get around, to communicate with friends, or to get 
involved in social campaigns. Indonesia is quickly becoming the “social media 
capital of the world.” The capital city of Jakarta is the most active Twitter 
city in the world and the country as a whole is the fourth most active on 
Facebook. The government, recognizing the importance of high-speed Internet to 
economic and social development, has committed to developing the country’s 
information and communications technology  (ICT) infrastructure by launching 
the “Indonesia Connected” program to boost connectivity in border and remote 
areas. Along with this development, however, came an increase in government’s 
concern over online content. While multistakeholder groups have participated in 
the often contentious debate over what online content should be filtered, by 
whom, under what processes, and according to which laws, their impact on 
policymaking is uncertain.

 As discussed in our infrastructure and governance post, Indonesia is currently 
drafting or revising a number of ICT-related laws that contain serious human 
rights implications. It is important, therefore, that elements that maintain 
respect for human rights are incorporated in the scope of these legislations. 
The Snowden revelations and a number of high-profile corruption cases in 
Indonesia have renewed calls for stricter regulations regarding wiretapping. 
The draft Law on Information Technology Criminal Offence (RUU Tindak Pidana 
Teknologi Informatika (TIPITI)) has raised concerns for being too broad and 
containing harsher penalties than the controversial Electronic Information and 
Transactions (EIT) Law (Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik). 
After much criticism, the government is currently revising the EIT law, 
particularly Article 45 which specifies the penalty for defamation as up to six 
years’ imprisonment and fines of up to IDR 1 billion (approximately USD 
106,000). The penalty isreportedly changed from six years to three, but the 
revision stopped short of decriminalizing defamation.

The Internet market in Indonesia is highly distributed and, as a consequence, 
the scope and depth of filtered content vary across over 200 different ISPs. 
Recently, however, the Indonesian government has aimed towards more centralized 
systems. The independent Nawala Foundation provides DNS server which enables 
service providers to block websites for pornography and gambling, among other 
categories. Its use is not compulsory for members of the Indonesian ISP 
Association (APJII), but it is encouraged. In addition, the Ministry of 
Communications and Information Technology (MCIT) maintains and endorses Trust+ 
(Trust Positif), a set of configuration files and block lists  for the popular 
open source Squid HTTP proxy and the SquidGuard add on which is an open source 
implementation of URL access control lists for Squid. Trust+ block lists 
include over 745,000 domain names and 55,000 URLs categorized as pornographic 
content. As implementation has been inconsistent across service providers, the 
MCIT is preparing a draft Ministerial Decree on the Controlling of Internet 
Websites with Negative Content (RPM Pengendalian Situs Internet Bermuatan 
Negatif) to establish uniform mechanism and condition for blocking and 
filtering.

The implementation of content control in Indonesia has been criticized for a 
number of reasons. Representatives from the APJII have warned that the costs 
associated with implementing content filter systems are burdensome for smaller 
ISPs and could potentially slow down Internet traffic. Also, our research has 
found that there have been instances of “mission creep” where websites 
containing religious issues and religious advocacy groups, and content related 
to sexuality and gender (e.g. local  LGBT community websites), among other 
content categories, are also blocked. Civil society has criticized government’s 
opaqueness and unresponsiveness to their concerns, especially with regard to 
the Trust+ system (e.g. which legislation governs the blocking mechanism of 
illegal content and the use of tools such as Trust+? If a website containing no 
illegal web content is blocked, what is the remedy mechanism? Who will pay for 
the costs incurred for the monitoring and screening of websites?). These 
concerns are made all the more serious when citizens are “very much invited” to 
participate in content control by forwarding URLs to an e-mail address or 
filling out a submission form (as of October 25, 2013, this form was “under 
development”).

Civil Society’s Role in the 2013 IGF

Civil society organizations play a key role in increasing awareness of 
citizens’ rights online. ICT Watch, one of our Cyber Stewards Network partners, 
as well as a number of other organizations such as Institute of Policy Research 
and Advocacy (ELSAM), Relawan TIK Indonesia (ICT Volunteers Indonesia), Center 
for Innovation Policy & Governance, and Hivos, launchedthe Indonesian CSO 
Network for Internet Governance (ID-CONFIG) in December 2012, which is a 
coalition of local civil society organizations (CSOs) that conducts dialogue on 
Internet governance issues on a regular basis. Under the banner of ID-CONFIG, 
civil society organizations participated actively in the 2013 IGF process. The 
Steering and Organizing Committees, for instance, include ID-CONFIG, the 
government, and the private sector. During the event’s planning stages, the 
Organizing Committee faceddelays in the finalization of the Host Country 
Agreement, as well as budgetary shortfalls (partially stemming from political 
turmoil following corruption allegations facing the Ministry of Communications 
and Information Technology), which threatened to see the event cancelled. The 
issue of funding for the 2013 meeting also sparked a more fundamental debate 
over how to fund the Internet Governance Forum generally. Following reports on 
social and news media that the Bali IGF would be cancelled due to a lack of 
funds, and a series of discussions on several mailing lists inquiring if this 
was really the case, the Chair of the IGF Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG) 
and former IGF Executive Secretary, Markus Kummer, maintained that “the UN has 
not received any official confirmation that Indonesia is withdrawing its offer 
to host the 2013 IGF” and that “cancelling the whole event is no option.” The 
group was eventually able to raise the funds, with domestic and international 
actors making financial contributions to cover the funding gap.

The coming together of these different stakeholders during the early stages of 
the event shaped how the 2013 IGF was constituted. The IGF has traditionally 
been a government-driven event as a substantial amount of funding is required 
to cover host country’s responsibilities, such as paying for the meeting venue 
and participant transportation, as well as the travel, per diem and at home 
replacement costs of UN staff, among other expenses. But the lack of government 
support provided the space for business and civil society communities to step 
up their role as a catalyst for the forum’s organization, and their influence 
could been seen throughout. For instance, in addition to fundraising for the 
event together, they suggested two overarching themes, “Internet Governance 
Towards Information Society through Multistakeholder Participation” and 
“Internet Governance to Achieve Sustainable Development through People’s 
Participation”. The theme which was adopted, “Building Bridges: Enhancing 
Multistakeholder Cooperation for Growth and Sustainable Development,” contained 
the key words “multistakeholder” and “sustainable development,” which were 
considered by these stakeholder groups as crucial components of Internet 
governance.

Civil society formed an integral part of the 2013 IGF Secretariat, responsible 
for running the event, which meant that they were in charge of tasks such as 
creating and maintaining the website and determining the distribution of 
resources among participants (e.g. nine booths were allocated to civil society 
versus 17 in total for government and private sector). The Secretariat worked 
with the Penabulu Foundation, a Hivos partner organization, who introduced 
measures to ensure financial transparency and accountability, such as standard 
operating procedures for auditing and reporting. During the event, a number of 
workshops such as “Civil Society and Internet Governance: Multi-Stakeholder 
Engagement Practices from Southeast Asia and Beyond” and “Social Media for 
Social Movement: How Civil Society Can Optimize The Internet to Conduct Online 
Public Advocacy of Human Rights” were organized by civil society groups. 
Moreover, the event on Day 0 — this year it was referred to as the High Level 
Leaders Meeting (HLLM) — which is traditionally organized as a ministerial 
meeting, was broadened in scope. Over 70 civil society participants were 
invited and three of them were speakers — including Citizen Lab’s Director Ron 
Deibert — compared to only two speakers each from government and private 
sector. Indonesia’s Minister of Communications and Information Technology’s 
statement at the HLLM was drafted with input from civil society. Following the 
event’s conclusion, the 2013 IGF narrative report is being drafted by civil 
society, including the Citizen Lab.

Citizen Lab staff and associates have participated in every IGF since the first 
meeting was held in Athens in 2006, as well as the WSIS meetings that preceded 
it in 2003 and 2005. At the 2005 WSIS meeting in Tunis, Citizen Lab researcher 
Nart Villeneuve’s presentation on Internet filtering was disrupted by Tunisian 
authorities and nearly cancelled. Moreover, our participation in the 2009 IGF 
in Egypt included having the book launch for the OpenNet Initiative’s “Access 
Controlled” interrupted by United Nations’ officials, following complaints by 
representatives for the government of China concerning our reference to Tibet 
and The Great Firewall of China in our published material. In contrast, the 
Citizen Lab was able to participate freely and openly at the 2013 IGF, 
including hosting a press conference on the publication of a series of blog 
posts titled “Monitoring Information Controls During the Bali IGF,” which 
discusses at length Indonesia’s content filtering and surveillance regimes.

Looking Forward

The IGF provided a springboard for Indonesian civil society organizations, 
working together with other stakeholder groups, to rally behind pressing 
Internet governance issues such as censorship and surveillance. The influence 
that civil society had on the 2013 IGF has been lauded as a model for how 
multistakeholder participation can operate at these events. It is hoped that 
the momentum of pushing for greater protection of the basic principles of human 
rights in the governing of the Internet in Indonesia can be maintained, and 
that the multistakeholder process can be sustained well past the event.

The government is working towards building ICT infrastructure and services to 
connect the archipelagic country from Sabang to Merauke. Indonesia’s youthful 
population means that technologies like the Internet are being adopted quickly. 
By the end of 2013, Indonesia’s Internet penetration rate is expected to reach 
33 percent, or roughly 80 million users. The business community’s role is 
crucial in ensuring that the growth in accessibility and usage of the Internet 
is achieved. For this development to happen, the country’s legal and regulatory 
framework must be consistent, greatly simplified, and harmonized to make it 
less burdensome and more transparent for business. These goals can be achieved 
by encouraging greater government accountability and transparency.

 Indonesia, as a founding member of the Open Government Partnership, has 
committed to a model of government that is “sustainably more transparent, more 
accountable, and more responsive to their own citizens.” The OGP pledge can be 
extended to the Internet governance sphere by the government’s collaboration 
with fellow stakeholders, such as businesses and civil society, when designing 
Internet-related policies, as well as creating mechanisms to facilitate and 
deepen this cooperation. For instance, while the government has held focus 
group discussions of early drafts of legislations, civil society has called for 
these discussions to be more transparent (e.g. recorded and made public), and 
for the government to ensure that relevant feedback are incorporated into the 
final drafts.

One of the more urgent concerns faced by the Indonesian government is 
cybercrime, and the population is becoming even more aware of its impact. A 
recent Akamai report indicated that the number of cybercrime incidents in the 
country is growing significantly. It is unsurprising, therefore, that Indonesia 
is involved in a number of regional initiatives to combat cybercrime. In 2011, 
the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) met in Bali to discuss 
transnational crime, recognizing that the organization should jointly combat 
cybercrime. The ASEAN Senior Officials Meeting on Transnational Crime met in 
Vietnam in 2013 to reconfirm its commitment to fighting crime in the region, 
and concluded with an endorsement for the creation of a working group on 
cybercrime. The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), of which Indonesia is 
a member, is working to ensure cooperation on combating cybercrime through the 
“Security and Prosperity Steering Group Experts Group on Cybercrime,” which is 
designed to “promote and improve cooperation among member economies in the 
fight against cybercrime.” Cybercrime issues are also expected to be discussed 
at the Ninth World Trade Organization (WTO) Ministerial Conference to be held 
in Indonesia in December 2013. Commentators are urging the WTO to help global 
victims of cybercrime and economic cyber espionage through clear “guidelines 
and penalties.” Unless a balance is maintained between national security 
concerns and lawful procedures and oversight mechanisms, these initiatives run 
the risk of adversely impacting civil liberties and human rights.

As development continues apace, civil society has an important role to play in 
engaging the general public, government, and private sector to ensure that 
Indonesia’s Internet governance regime respects and protects basic principles 
of human rights. Achieving this  balance requires constant monitoring and 
continuous reexamination of policies and practices, and a proactive engagement 
with like-minded domestic and international stakeholders. With the impending 
establishment of the ASEAN Economic Community 2015, it is expected that there 
will be more consolidated collaboration in the area of cybercrime and cyber 
security. Together with our colleagues in the region, we will be monitoring 
developments in the country’s Internet governance agenda closely and support 
one that promotes democracy, human rights, transparency, and accountability.

Ronald Deibert
Director, the Citizen Lab 
and the Canada Centre for Global Security Studies
Munk School of Global Affairs
University of Toronto
(416) 946-8916
PGP: http://deibert.citizenlab.org/pubkey.txt
http://deibert.citizenlab.org/
twitter.com/citizenlab
[email protected]



-- 
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of 
list guidelines will get you moderated: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, 
change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at 
[email protected].

Reply via email to