On 20 Nov 2013, at 22:17, Shava Nerad <shav...@gmail.com> wrote:

> IANAL, but it seems to me that if the judge does not call the lawyers into 
> chambers for consultation, there is no period of commentary on sentencing, or 
> adjustment period.

IAANAL, so you’ll have to explain the significance of what this means? 

> If the plea is innocent, then the sentence can be appealed through a trial at 
> a higher court -- however, Hammond opted due to the rather excessively 
> abusive CFAA law which would have put him away for 35 years for a guilty plea 
> for ten years.  This means he had to live with the judge’s ruling which had 
> this “side car" of court supervised idiocy tagged on -- which actually made 
> me immediately think that the judge had read up on Kevin Mitnick's trial and 
> was trying to sound like he knew something he didn't.

Wait, if he read up on Mitnick’s trial and thought he understood…no let’s not 
go there..

> Couldn’t stick with the ten years, had to piss on it, pardon my crudeness.

Don’t follow.

Bernard

(He who understands follows little)


> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Bernard Tyers - ei8fdb <ei8...@ei8fdb.org> 
> wrote:
> It seems a similar stupidly idiotic requirement to the one imposed on Kevin 
> Mitnick when he was released.
> 
> From memory the requirment on him was that he wasn’t allowed to use 
> “computers or telephony” equipment. It might have been possible in the early 
> 2000’s but today?
> 
> IANAL, but would it be worth getting some lawyers to prod this argument 
> further? “You’re honour, what is defined as cryptography?” At least then (in 
> the US) there’d be precedent on what is seen as crypto? Or does that already 
> exist?
> 
> Could be good for an education campaign “Crypto is not the end goal” to spead 
> the already daily use of cryptography as opposed to the unfortunate view that 
> “crypto is for turrists and sex fiends”.
> 
> “The government see [online banking] as using cryptography. Everyone uses it.”
> 
> Just a thought…
> 
> 
> On 16 Nov 2013, at 06:01, Shava Nerad <shav...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > It is so common for judges to be complètement sans clue regarding 
> > technology -- I'm sure the judge has no idea how pervasive crypto is, 
> > probably doesn't understand his online banking uses it, and so on.
> >
> > It's tragic.
> >
> > bleh.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Yosem Companys <compa...@stanford.edu> 
> > wrote:
> > From: Privarchy Mee <privar...@gmail.com>
> >
> > Can any of you, most of whom I do not doubt are far more knowledgeable
> > about cryptography and how it's conceptualised within the legal
> > sphere, offer some insight regarding this?
> >
> > https://twitter.com/CyMadD0x/status/401443518612512769
> >
> > The claim is that Judge Loretta A. Preska, who sentenced Jeremy
> > Hammond today, said that for the three years (post-release) that he
> > was to spend under supervision, he will not be able to use encryption
> > for communication or storage purposes(!) which is practically a legal
> > edict to go and build a cabin by Walden Pond. How can this be
> > considered anything but cruel and unusual?
> > —
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Bernard / bluboxthief / ei8fdb
> 
> IO91XM / Contact me: me.ei8fdb.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of 
> list guidelines will get you moderated: 
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, 
> change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at 
> compa...@stanford.edu.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Shava Nerad
> shav...@gmail.com
> -- 
> Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of 
> list guidelines will get you moderated: 
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, 
> change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at 
> compa...@stanford.edu.

--------------------------------------
Bernard / bluboxthief / ei8fdb

IO91XM / Contact me: me.ei8fdb.org



-- 
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of 
list guidelines will get you moderated: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, 
change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at 
compa...@stanford.edu.

Reply via email to