Basically I argue that freedom is attainable if we get religion (sort
of) and sail among the stars. And law is rational only if it purposes
a myth, such as that one. http://zelea.com/w/Stuff:Votorola/p/nMy
Contents:
1. Collective autonomy: a methodological argument
1.1. The basic argument
1.2. The feasibility of a consensus myth
2. Individual autonomy: a subjective argument
2.1. Freeing the aesthetic practice of formal consensus
2.2. The subjective argument
3. Autonomy in immortality: a mythic argument
4. Reflections in the light of mythopoeic overguidance
I post this mostly as a matter of record. It might be of interest to
others (it's nominally on topic), but I'm unsure whether the arguments
are sound, or even original. I'm just starting the initial research.
--
Michael Allan
Toronto, +1 416-699-9528
http://zelea.com/
--
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of
list guidelines will get you moderated:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe,
change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at
[email protected].
