Il 11/25/13, 11:34 PM, Tamzen Cannoy ha scritto: > I think compatibility is the feature that will have to go. Kill SMTP and move > on. You cannot rewrite ancient protocols that were never intended to be > secure to add security. Go total secure and then allow people to back some of > it out if they need compatibility with older systems. SMTP is a transport protocol, with some basic signaling capability.
I don't see a single concrete, practical reason why it should "substituted" and not just improved here and there. -- Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) HERMES - Center for Transparency and Digital Human Rights http://logioshermes.org - http://globaleaks.org - http://tor2web.org -- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected].
