On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Maxim Kammerer <[email protected]> wrote: >> "That was really bad," >> admits Kobeissi, but he assures Wired.co.uk that subsequent audits of >> the program have affirmed its integrity. > > ... as did prior audits.
all non-trivial code has bugs and oversights. audit is not a finite thing, one and done. code integrity a continuous and open process; where do i donate for Cryptocat scrutiny? crowd sourced audits, like TrueCrypt, are wonderful collaborations. bounties also good for signalling false assumptions. -- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected].
