-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 01/10/2014 05:18 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > > But if you've got GNS up and running why do you need Namecoin? > *** Indeed, you don't, but the probable scenario is co-existence of various systems. Already the Namecoin specs supports resource records for Tor and I2P in addition to .bit and regular DNS.
I had a discussion with zzz from I2P about the possibility to run I2P and Gnunet on the same host, and have mechanisms to make it transparent for the user to jump from one network to the other. Just brainstorming really, but IMO the "one ring to rule them all" solution is a bit 20th Century. Fragmentation of the online self sounds safer anyway. That said, I'm curious of hearing about various P2P microblogging systems. And happy new year. == hk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJS0FgEAAoJEEgGw2P8GJg9w+wP/3tyzHl9D+XxETkLQwhd2c5Q N+s+lZTG1PLufKjS4ej6/GRFUfE2hBcZEQbG2x0lxtTMgEBlmAJYBs9qk3a1uO5P YBDZ7LfH1cXnlQZ2yRgW13phnRgsJO/szcr2uq6q7QM7ickV6peUGCaAMT49ieol iwX+4pAeokmccOxA0KWNpK8G0FdHALKowVxs0ZYr+PKSgcG3DjsKJit95zYHG+av hkKDtfaoWhVK+eE/zJOqFV5ux7ow95MJfJbAN0u+8F/rVeDuWrjf7k9bX0Hj7lxu gCgDS80tIf7Q9DEFAaktu21tUNRp++pnCK3BV63z0T4ChhKBB2tqlr3gqNLAs6LK vs6SZOqlrwS7sbuW43/CiBbNthgE4aimBslFPyxutI/dCuz1urDq9/7XbPB51pHz v7cz4IH+v5hr7uNpqhxYs4CJAqfFe3tZjXSehrZAlx/2hyehlUquJ9uMmvwThzvp YOsPPg/MEQhwMgzBLG4BagfwqRyazyYbpVC/ZKgEEwm+3enfq99skb38i7ha53Mf /RUcnui9RGEn+sQ0nP9uSIaeIrQwLocMsxrat1ewElL8qyQkYnkQmjyUKfGfR+eZ ZsuGrcc1zZ12lwd8Eklp9+Pl+1vI6TbUNHWMtg0Hu1NzgGgukb9KAg3SmCYqRS9P MP6H/9gkB/ySO8YCqMGE =VY4l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected].
