On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:37 AM, Sahar Massachi <sa...@brandeis.edu> wrote:
> The fact that there's a "naked sudo" hole is brutal.
>
> Forgive me if I misunderstand the problem, but how could *anyone* ship a
> distribution with a passwordless sudo? That seems like it requires
> deliberate malice to even set up.

Careful here: Tails had passwordless sudo prior to v0.11, less than 2
years ago. So either unlimited local root access is not such a big
deal, or recommendation to use Tails is short-sighted — in either case
the report has a problem. I suggest that the report author sweeps both
issues under the carpet simultaneously using a politically correct
language referencing problems that were taken care of a long time ago,
and are not that critical to begin with.

-- 
Maxim Kammerer
Liberté Linux: http://dee.su/liberte
-- 
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of 
list guidelines will get you moderated: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, 
change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at 
compa...@stanford.edu.

Reply via email to