Maybe not: http://lynx.browser.org/.
On a more serious note - Scandal? Like ... iOS putting all your footsteps into a file for you scandal? -Travis On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 1:18 PM, carlo von lynX <[email protected] > wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 03:12:06PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote: > > Please have a look at: > > http://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/contact.html > > pebcak, problem solved. > > > A definition of "p0wned by google" would be great, too. > > In the case of privoxy it was a joke related to my pebcak. > > In the case of Chromium.. well.. you know it > > In the case of Mozilla.. I just mention this habit of > checking "safebrowsing.google.com" every half an hour, > correlating a user's IP or exit node with her Google cookie. > > I know that 0.0001% of the population are aware of being > spied upon by safebrowsing.google.com and capable of > turning it off. > > And I know there are tons of people who think > safebrowsing.google.com is an important service that > Google could in no way make available anonymously > because.. OMG.. then it wouldn't make money with it!! > > And it wouldn't make Uncle Sam satisfied. > > (Yes of course "safebrowsing" could be architected > in a way that the data is distributed anonymously > and in respect of privacy, much like the mirror > networks of linux distributions for example) > > I presume safebrowsing.google.com isn't the only > spyware in web browsers, but one of the most efficient > ones. > > Or maybe my personal observation of web browser > activity patterns are somehow misguided. > I'm just articulating what I noticed since no-one > in the community seems to have developed a critical > opinion regarding that service. > > Wikipedia has no "Criticism" box about it. Neither > does https://wiki.mozilla.org/Phishing_Protection > in any way question the practice of having the > browser periodically call "home." > > I presume this could be a major scandal, but since > I'm not a major blogger it's just a little voice > on a little mailing list. > > Maybe some journalist picks it up and researches > in-depth if my observations are correct? > > And I wasn't considering non-free or secondary browsers. > > So from this ironically desperate point of view all > browsers are p0wned. > > -- > Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations > of list guidelines will get you moderated: > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. > Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at > [email protected]. > -- Twitter <https://twitter.com/tbiehn> | LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn>| GitHub <http://github.com/tbiehn> | TravisBiehn.com<http://www.travisbiehn.com> | Google Plus <https://plus.google.com/+TravisBiehn>
-- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected].
