Hi Arjuna, Just a quick note that usage can be quite different across Africa: it's a big country! [sic]. So by rural; urban; income; gender, phone ownership is only one aspect of an individual's use strategy. Don't assume that an owned smart phone is on, charged, or connected to data, indeed it is probably being used very differently than a North American or European might expect.
A lot of Africa ICT infographics use ITU figures, which tend to be very boosterish, citing for instance sim subscriptions rather than the much smaller number of active users. This works well for the telcos, who want to look big, and for the ministers of communication, who want to look "developed." But even if you project active users, these figures can still be pretty misleading. Many urban professionals will have multiple sim phones, or simply multiple phones, in order to allow cheaper in-network calls with friends/colleagues with different providers. How many North Americans or Europeans use multiple sims every day? I've seen many journalists and scholars conflate subscriptions with people. One way we tried to reconcile the figures with what we saw in the field was to divide the ITU's reported total of a country's voice minutes by population. This was back of envelope -- don't cite me and do correct me if I'm wrong -- but from what we saw in 2012, Kenyans spent an average of 3.5 minutes per week in a voice call, Ghanaians 3, Nigerians 1. These are most people's primary phones, and this is average not the median, so given income distributions it would be safe to imagine that something like 80% of the population is far lower. In most of the countries I've been to telco data packages are pretty expensive, and edge/3g/4g networks are worse than GSM. So in a rural area there may be no data available, but you'll still see some smart phones. Add to that the problem of charging outside urban areas, and many users simply carry a powered off phone without credit. In rural Uganda, where I'm working, when a farmer has to make a call, s/he travels kilometers to a shop to charge and purchase credits. Why tie up your money in credits that might devalue? But this strategy means that one is generally not available for received calls/texts. Why have a smart phone if you aren't really connected to data? For instance, there are big bluetooth/sd card movie/music trading networks. An Xiao Mina found folks with dubbed martial arts movies that had been passed by hand for long distances [ http://thenewinquiry.com/essays/mapping-the-sneakernet/]. Susan Wyche also wrote about some of the patterns of use in (iirc) Kenya in ""Dead China-make" phones off the grid: Investigating and designing for mobile phone use in rural Africa." All of which is to say that the Pew figures are probably correct, but parsing their meaning requires quite a bit of local knowledge. If anyone can get deeper figures on data usage, background data usage, time powered on, etc, I'd be excited to see them. C. -- Chris Csikszentmihályi ERA Chair & Scientific Director Professor [image: m-itiLogo] <http://www.m-iti.org/> ------------------------------ www.m-iti.org | c...@m-iti.org | edgyproduct.org <http://edgyproduct.org> * "Art means… to resist the course of a world that unceasingly holds a gun to mankind's chest." --Theodore Adorno*
-- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu.
