What the terrorists want What do Islamist terrorists want? The answer should be obvious, but it is not.
A generation ago, terrorists did make their wishes very clear. On hijacking three airliners in September 1970, for example, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine demanded, with success, the release of Arab terrorists imprisoned in Great Britain, Switzerland, and West Germany. On attacking the Bnai Brith headquarters and two other Washington, D.C. buildings in 1977, a Hanafi Muslim group demanded the canceling of a feature movie, Mohammad, Messenger of God, $750 (as reimbursement for a fine), the turning over of the five men who had massacred the Hanafi leaders family, plus the killer of Malcolm X. Such non-negotiable demands lead to wrenching hostage dramas and attendant policy dilemmas. We will never negotiate with terrorists, declared the policymakers. Give them Hawaii but get my husband back, pleaded the hostages wives. Those days are so remote and their terminology so forgotten that even the American president now speaks of non-negotiable demands (in his case, concerning human dignity), forgetting the deadly origins of this phrase. Instead, most anti-Western terrorist attacks these days are perpetrated without demands being enunciated. Bombs go off, planes get hijacked and crashed into buildings, hotels collapse. The dead are counted. Detectives trace back the perpetrators identities. Shadowy websites make post-hoc unauthenticated claims. But the reasons for the violence go unexplained. Analysts, including myself, are left speculating about motives. These can concern the terrorists personal grievances such as poverty, prejudice, or cultural alienation. Alternately, they can respond to international politics: Pulling a Madrid and getting governments to pull their troops from Iraq. Convincing Americans to leave Saudi Arabia. Ending U.S. support for Israel. Pressuring New Delhi to cede control of all Kashmir. Any of these motives could have contributed to the violence; as Londons Daily Telegraph puts it, problems in Iraq and Afghanistan each added a new pebble to the mountain of grievances that militant fanatics have erected. Yet none of these issues is decisive to giving up ones life for the sake of killing others. In nearly all cases, the jihadi terrorists have a patently self-evident ambition: to establish a world dominated by Muslims, Islam, and the Sharia (Islamic law). Or, again to cite the Daily Telegraph, their real project is the extension of the Islamic territory across the globe, and the establishment of a worldwide caliphate founded on Sharia law. Terrorists openly declare this goal. The Islamists who assassinated Anwar el-Sadat in 1981 decorated their holding cages with banners proclaiming The caliphate or death. A biography of Abdullah Azzam, one of the most influential Islamist thinkers of recent times and an influence on Osama bin Laden, declares that his life revolved around a single goal, namely the establishment of Allah's Rule on earth and restoring the caliphate. Bin Laden himself spoke of ensuring that the pious Caliphate will start from Afghanistan. His chief deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri, also dreamed of re-establishing the caliphate, for then, he wrote, history would make a new turn, God willing, in the opposite direction against the empire of the United States and the worlds Jewish government. Another al-Qaeda leader, Fazlur Rehman Khalil, publishes a magazine that declares, Due to the blessings of jihad, Americas countdown has begun. It will declare defeat soon, to be followed by the creation of a caliphate. Or, as Mohammed Bouyeri wrote in the note he attached to the corpse of Theo van Gogh, the Dutch filmmaker he had just assassinated, Islam will be victorious through the blood of martyrs who spread its light in every dark corner of this earth. Interestingly, Bouyeri was frustrated by the mistaken motives attributed to him, insisting at his trial: I did what I did purely out of my beliefs. I want you to know that I acted out of conviction and not that I took his life because he was Dutch or because I was Moroccan and felt insulted. Although terrorists state their jihadi motives loudly and clearly, Westerners and Muslims alike too often avert their eyes. Islamic organizations, Canadian author Irshad Manji observes, pretend that Islam is an innocent bystander in todays terrorism. What the terrorists want is abundantly clear. It requires monumental denial not to acknowledge it, but we Westerners have risen to the challenge. --------------------------------- Mr. Pipes (www.DanielPipes.org) is director of the Middle East Forum and author of Miniatures (Transaction Publishers). http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18894 --------------------------------- Too much spam in your inbox? Yahoo! Mail gives you the best spam protection for FREE! http://in.mail.yahoo.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
