For me, the space-experiment project exposes the government even much better. It is okay with me if Unitedstates wishes to kill those foolish enough to entrust their lives voluntarily to Unitedstates for dangerous scientific experiments (the "astronauts"). Such killing is at least probably good for the gene pool. However, the part about flinging pieces of metal over three or four states--I imagine at considerable speed--well, please just imagine if you or I or a corporation or any other nongovernmental agency had done that! There would have been a kind of environmentalists' Armageddon! They'd still be trying to create a punishment that would be harsh enough. It would even have taken their minds off the Arabs. Yet, as things are, no one except me seems to have noticed any possible danger to the public. Is it true that no one and nothing--in all that territory--was struck by any of their trash? If so, it is enough to cause faith in miracles. Finally, there came Unitedstates' dictum that the trash of their regrettable experiment was too sacred to be touched by ordinary folk.
uncoolrabbit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What never ceases to amaze me is the individuals who maintain there stead fast support to this goverment over the years, completly alowing it to negate its responsibility for both its actions and inactions. Atleast the polls have shown that recent events, to include Katrina and Gas Prices primarily, have had a great deal of effect on peoples aproval. That is some one hopefull, and a good reminder to any political hopefulls that the average american only cares about what is going on in his own back yard, and will give free reign to dealings in the rest of the world regaurdless of its inderect consequences. --- In [email protected], "Victor Bozzo" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > www fff.org > > > Send to a friend > Printer Friendly PDF Format > Subscribe to FFF Email Update > Subscribe to Freedom Daily > > > Katrina Exposes Government for What It Is > by Sheldon Richman, September 14, 2005 > > If a private-sector employee performed as badly as the federal, state, and local governments performed before, during, and after Hurricane Katrina, he would be summarily fired. But the governments will claim their budgets were too small and proceed to extract more money from the taxpayers. That's how the political world works. And it's part of the reason that governments perform as miserably as they do. > > Hurricane Katrina should finally disabuse people of the idea that government exists to take care of them, especially the most vulnerable. That self-serving promise was never credible. Do we need more evidence that it was a fraud? With guardians like these, who needs enemies? > > Government at one level or another dominated every hurricane-related service on the Gulf Coast of Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama, and in New Orleans. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for decades has managed the levees and other forms of flood protection. Governments continually gave assurances that it had plans to deal with a major storm before and after it made landfall. Doubts were often voiced by the newspapers and weather experts, who warned that the agencies were not prepared, that the levees would not contain the water, and that many casualties would result. But the politicians told the residents otherwise, and the residents believed them, having been taught to trust their "leaders." When the emergency systems failed under the force of Katrina and thousands of people were abandoned, we all got a rude awakening. > > This time the self-aggrandizing politicians and bureaucrats must not get away with their lame excuses. They are responsible for many needless deaths and much property destruction. We all should be outraged. > > A private company that had built those levees and made those assurances would have hell to pay. It would be facing bankruptcy and its officers lawsuits for gross negligence or even criminal indictments. The prospect of such consequences tends to deter private harmful conduct. But government personnel are effectively immune from such consequences. They don't risk their own capital. Accountability is nonexistent. There are likely to be no dismissals, much less indictments. > > The problem is not only the people who run the agencies. It is in the nature of bureaucracy, which gets its money through coercive taxation, does not receive market feedback from consumers and insurance companies, and never faces bankruptcy. Cynics love to denigrate private businesses as putting profits before people, but it was Wal-Mart and Home Depot that were getting the goods to desperate people (when government agents weren't impeding them) while FEMA was still recovering from the shock that the levees failed. > > The words "Army Corps" and "boondoggle" have long gone together naturally. The Washington Post reported that "over the five years of President Bush's administration, Louisiana has received far more money for Corps civil works projects than any other state, about $1.9 billion.... But hundreds of millions of dollars have gone to unrelated water projects demanded by the state's congressional delegation and approved by the Corps, often after economic analyses that turned out to be inaccurate." It quoted Pam Dashiell, president of the Holy Cross Neighborhood Association in New Orleans: "Our politicians never cared half as much about protecting us as they cared about pork." As the Post emphasized, "In fact, more than any other federal agency, the Corps is controlled by Congress; its $4.7 billion civil works budget consists almost entirely of 'earmarks' inserted by individual legislators." > > But it is not only the Corps that failed. It's FEMA and that monstrosity the Department of Homeland Security. It's President Bush and his outrageous war in Iraq, which has diverted precious resources for a fool's errand. It's also the state and local governments. All can be condemned for the same offense: They took on solemn tasks, made people dependent on them, precluded private alternatives - and then failed miserably. That is government in all its glory. > > Sheldon Richman is senior fellow at The Future of Freedom Foundation, author of Tethered Citizens: Time to Repeal the Welfare State, and editor of The Freeman magazine. Send him email. > > > > > Send to a friend > Printer Friendly PDF Format > Subscribe to FFF Email Update > Subscribe to Freedom Daily > > > > > > Home | About Us | Freedom Daily | Commentaries | Web Audio/Video > Books & Tapes | What's New | Spreading the Word | Links > Subscribe & Support | En Español | Contact Us > © 2001-2005 The Future of Freedom Foundation. All rights reserved. > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/VpgUKB/pzNLAA/cUmLAA/KlSolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
