REPOSTS ON: 09-30-AD2005 Archived at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LLNews5
Out:07:32am
Join and check http://groups.yahoo.com/group/govtwatch4 for the BEST in the
latest headlines and news!
HTML Copies of this newsletter are in LLNews5 and
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/worldcom
To be cut from more mai lings just email me back at this address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since Yahoo ID's are sometimes DELETED, USE ABOVE EMAIL ADDRESS TO CORRESPOND
^ ^
September 28, 2005
Venezuela Begins Preparations to Accept American War Refugees as United States
Military Leaders Prepare To Close All Borders and Enact Total Police State
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Russian Subscribers
Russian Intelligence sources are reporting this week that Venezuelan President
Chavez has ordered his Government Ministries to begin preparations for the
orderly processing of American war refugees that will soon be attempting to
flee the United States during the upcoming closing of their borders to prevent
their citizens from escape.
Not since the events of last centuries great wars has the world even had to
contemplate such a massive movement of peoples fleeing a dictatorial and
fascist regime, and as history has shown was not met by the worlds governments
with any kindness, but rather with disdain. Perhaps of the many thousands of
examples from those times, those of the plights of the German war refugees of
the S.S. St. Louis, and the Kindertransport children should serve as an example
for the American people of today in what they may soon be facing, and as we can
read from the reports of those times:
Of the events that occurred with the war refugees of the S.S. St. Louis we can
read, "On May 13, 1939, six months after Kristallnacht, 937 men, women, and
children, boarded the S.S. St. Louis for Cuba. 930 of them were Jewish
refugees from Nazi persecution among the last to escape from Germanys
tightening restrictions on emigration. The ship arrived near the Havana harbor
two weeks later, on May 27, 1939. The passengers were unaware of a
disappointing development. Cubas government had changed, just a week before
the ship had sailed. The new government would not honor their visas. The new
administration ruled that only 28 passengers held valid passports and could
enter the country.
The ship stayed in the Havana harbor in the blistering heat for one week, while
officials of the Jewish Joint Distribution Committee tried to gain the
admission of the rest of the passengers. Friends and relatives waited on shore,
and some even hired motorboats to sail out to meet the ship. Now that the ship
could not dock in Cuba, Captain Schroeder sailed it to the Florida coast. There
he hoped that the United States would admit the passengers. Desperately trying
to avoid a forced return to Germany and certain death, the passengers more
than 400 of whom were women and children, and many of whom actually had quota
numbers to eventually enter the United States sent a telegram to Roosevelt
asking for help. They received no reply. The State Department sent word that
it would not interfere in Cuban affairs and refused to allow the passengers to
come ashore. In fact, even as the ship was entering Floridas territories, the
Coast Guard had fired a warning shot in its direction. The
captain knew that there was no choice but to turn back toward Germany.
Sailing along the coast of Florida on its way to Europe, the St. Louis was
shadowed by a Coast Guard ship to prevent passengers from swimming to freedom
in the United States. The New York Times lamented, Off our shores she [the
St. Louis] was attended by a helpful Coast Guard vessel alert to pick up any
passengers who plunged overboard and thrust them back
The refugees could even
see the shimmering towers of Miami
the battlements of another forbidden city.
For Hitler, the case of the S.S. St. Louis marked a stunning victory. It proved
that, in spite of the protestations of the Allied leaders to the contrary, they
didnt want Jews in their countries any more than he wanted them in his. In
fact, when a Canadian official was asked how many Jews fleeing from Nazi Europe
could be admitted to Canada, he responded: None is too many.
Of the Kindertransport war refugee children we can also read, "Kindertransport
(Children's Transport) was the informal name of a rescue effort which brought
thousands of refugee Jewish children to Great Britain from Nazi Germany between
1938 and 1940. The first children's transport arrived in Harwich, Great
Britain, on December 2, 1938, bringing about 200 children from a Jewish
orphanage in Berlin. The last transport from Germany left in September 1939,
just before World War II began. In 1940, British authorities interned as enemy
aliens about 1,000 children from the children's transport program on the Isle
of Man and in other internment camps in Canada and Australia."
Even more shocking than these American people facing their lives under Fascist
Military Rule is that the path they have embarked upon is the same one of the
German people under the Fascist Military Rule of the Nazis, and as we can read
from the history of those dark days, "The German citizens naively witnessed
Hitler seize and maintain power. They were bystanders who listened to his
promises for a prosperous society and national glory for Germany, but watched
the Nazis practice terrorism and murder. The German citizenry was viewed as an
easy takeover target by the Nazis, whose master propagandist. Dr. Joseph
Goebbels, said, "We come like wolves descending on a herd of sheep". Witnessing
bystanders were not only German citizens who allowed Hitler to rise to power.
They were political leaders around the world who watched Germany become a
totalitarian state where the government permitted no opposition."
Today as the Wehrmacht Helmeted Forces of the United States, and their Axis
Allies, execute their Global War aims using terrorism and murder, once again
the world is stunned by the spectacle of the American people themselves, and
just like their Nazi German counterparts, remaining silent, and as we can read
from these various reports:
As reported by the Ireland On Line News Service in their article titled US
soldiers 'posted photos of Iraqi bodies on web" and which says, "The Pentagon
is to investigate claims that US soldiers posted pictures of Iraqi corpses on
the internet in return for access to porn. The photos show dismembered bodies
and limbs and include captions also allegedly written by troops."
As reported by the Associated Press News Service in their article titled
"Troops tortured detainees, Human Rights Watch alleges" and which says,
"Soldiers in the Army's elite 82nd Airborne Division vented their frustration
by systematically torturing Iraqi detainees from 2003 into 2004, hitting them
with baseball bats and dousing them with chemicals, a U.S. rights group alleges
in a new report. The Human Rights Watch report, issued Friday, was compiled
from interviews with a captain and two sergeants who served in a battalion of
the 82nd Airborne that was stationed at a military base called Mercury near
Fallujah, the insurgent stronghold retaken by U.S. forces last year."
As reported by the Canadian Global Research Organization News Service in their
article titled "Enduring Torture" and which says, "Since the release of the
Taguba Report on U.S. treatment of Iraqi prisoners of war (POWs) and detainees,
the unlawful practices of torture and abuses continue at an increasing rate and
brutality. Thanks to Western governments and media complicity in the crimes,
the practices are becoming part of the West sacred "shared values". A new
report by the U.S-based Human Rights Watch (HRW) based on soldiers testimony,
reveals that those troops were following orders on how to torture, and abuse
Iraqi detainees and POWs."
And not just to these new shared values of the torturing and murdering of
defenseless Prisoners of War have the Fascist Powers of the American Axis
descended, but also to the protection of one of the worlds most wanted
International Terrorists, and as we can read as reported by the American El
Paso Times News Service in their article titled "Cuban militant can stay in
U.S." and which says:
"Alleged Cuban terrorist Luis Posada Carriles can stay in the United States, an
El Paso immigration judge ruled late Monday. Judge William L. Abbott granted a
deferral of removal, meaning Posada would not be deported to Cuba or Venezuela
-- his country of citizenship -- where he is wanted in connection with the
bombing of a Cuban airliner in 1976 that killed 73 people. The ruling has been
awaited by critics of the Bush administration, who said letting Posada stay
would show that the United States has a double standard for terrorists.
"It's giving a signal to the world -- there's good terrorism and bad terrorism.
And we look after our terrorists," said Luis Martin, a member of an anti-war
group in Albuquerque who came to El Paso to picket for Posada's deportation
during the trial. Posada is an anti-Castro activist and a former CIA operative
whose case "reads like a character from one of Robert Ludlum's espionage
thrillers, with all the plot twists and turns Ludlum is famous for," Judge
Abbott wrote in his decision. Posada worked for the CIA during the Cold War,
court documents showed, and for the United States government in Central America
in support of the Contras in Nicaragua."
Not just to the accepting of their Military Forces engaging in torture and
murder have these Western people been complying with either, but also to the
allowing of the most barbaric and draconian laws to destroy their freedoms are
they also compliant too, and as we can read from these various reports:
As reported by Britains Guardian Unlimited News Service in their article
titled "This is an act of censorship worthy of Joseph Goebbels" and which says,
"The plan to draw up a list of historical events that people can be prosecuted
for celebrating is a sign of a leader losing his grip."
As reported by the Reuters News Service in their article titled "Australia to
impose "draconian" anti-terror laws" and which says, "Australia is to impose
"draconian" counter-terrorism laws after state and territory leaders agreed on
Tuesday to wide-ranging security proposals made by Prime Minister John Howard
in the wake of the London bombings."
As reported by Britains Telegraph News Service in their article titled
"Anti-terrorism laws supported by Blair" and which says, "Mr. Blair strongly
defended Government plans to strengthen anti-terrorism laws yesterday,
dismissing as "exaggerated" protests that traditional civil liberties were
being cast aside."
As reported by the American Newsday News Service in their article titled "Bush
urges larger role for military" and which says, "Seeking to head off a replay
of Hurricane Katrina foul-ups, President George W. Bush yesterday called on
Congress to consider giving the U.S. military a leading role in recovery
efforts in a catastrophic natural disaster or terrorist attack, a break with
precedent sure to spark controversy."
To the Western people, especially Americans, accepting the totalitarian
barbarities of the Fascist Military States they are creating, and their reasons
for doing so, can be seen in very words of Adolph Hitler himself, and who had
said, The great strength of the totalitarian state is that it forces those who
fear it to imitate it."
And nowhere in the world is this fear more evident in the United States,
where today the testing of fire they are taking is being failed by their once
free citizens on many levels, but perhaps most evident in their moral leaders,
and as we can read as reported by the Information Clearing House News Agency in
their article titled "Torturous Silence on Torture" and which says:
Where do American religious leaders stand on torture? Their deafening silence
evokes memories of the unconscionable behavior of German church leaders in the
1930s and early 1940s. Despite the hate whipped up by administration
propagandists against those it brands "terrorists," most Americans agree that
torture should not be permitted. Few seem aware, though, that although
President George W. Bush says he is against torture, he has openly declared
that our military and other interrogators may engage in torture "consistent
with military necessity."
For far too long, we have been acting like "obedient Germans." Shall we
continue to avert our eyes even as our mainstream media begin to expose the
"routine" torture conducted by U.S. forces in Iraq, Afghanistan, and
Guantanamo? By keeping their tongue-tied heads way down, our religious leaders
have forfeited the moral authority with which they otherwise could speak. They
end up playing the role of Hitler's Reichsbishops, who supported or at least
acquiesced in the policies and methods of the Third Reich.
Many American men and women Jews, Christians, Muslims of the Abrahamic
tradition have learned not to depend on clergy leaders who bless the Empire.
The inescapable conclusion is, as popular theologian Annie Dillard reminds us,
"There is only us; there never has been any other." The question is this: Are
we are up to the challenge of confronting the evil of torture, or shall we
prove Patrick Henry right? Is our country about to be "lost and undone?"
To the Venezuelan Presidents directive to his Government Ministries to begin
the preparations for their countries receiving American War Refugees is
consistent with his actions towards the American people, and whom he admires to
the extent that he has offered to their poorest citizens relief from their
internal fuel crisis, and as we can read as reported by the ZNet News Service
in their article titled Chavez Staying True To Pledge For U.s. Poor" and which
says:
"When Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said on the weekend that he was going to
open the taps on subsidized heating oil for poor folks in the United States,
many assumed it was a drive-by comment aimed at raising the ire of his frequent
critics in Washington. But, as it turns out, Mr. Chavez is a man of his word.
Officials at Citgo Petroleum Corp. -- the Houston-based company that is wholly
owned by Venezuela's state-owned energy company -- say they are scrambling to
put the fine points on Mr. Chavez's promise to supply some of the poorest
neighbourhoods in the United States with cheap heating oil this winter."
Today as our world plunges towards Total War, Global Weather Chaos,
Catastrophic Earthquakes and a Flu Pandemic estimated by the World Health
Organization to cause the deaths of over 100 Million human beings, no one
people, no one nation, will be more devastated than those of the United States.
Not for their not being warned of these events, and like the German people of
last century were also warned, but rather because they would not listen, or in
listening they would mock, and while laughing off the warnings given to them
failed to prepare.
© September 28, 2005, EU and US all rights reserved.
[Ed. Note: The United States government actively seeks to find, and silence,
any and all opinions about the United States except those coming from
authorized government and/or affiliated sources, of which we are not one. No
interviews are granted and very little personal information is given about our
contributors to protect their safety.]
---------------------------------
http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts09262005.html
September 26, 2005
Iraq War Winners: Al-Qaeda, Iran and Military ContractorsAmerica is Running Out
of Time
By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS
George W. Bush will go down in history as the president who fiddled while
America lost its superpower status.
Bush used deceit and hysteria to lead America into a war that is bleeding the
US economically, militarily, and diplomatically. The war is being fought with
hundreds of billions of dollars borrowed from foreigners. The war is bleeding
the military of troops and commitments. The war has ended the US claim to moral
leadership and exposed the US as a reckless and aggressive power.
Focused on a concocted "war on terrorism," the Bush administration diverted
money from the New Orleans levees to Iraq, with the consequence that the US now
has a $100 billion rebuild bill on top of the war bill.
The US is so short of troops that neoconservatives are advocating the use of
foreign mercenaries paid with US citizenship.
US efforts to isolate Iran have been blocked by Russia and China, nuclear
powers that Bush cannot bully.
The Iraqi war has three beneficiaries: (1) al Qaeda, (2) Iran and (3) US war
industries and Bush-Cheney cronies who receive no-bid contracts.
Everyone else is a loser.
The war has bestowed on al Qaeda recruits, prestige, and a training ground.
The war has allied Iran with Iraq's Shi'ite majority.
The war has brought soaring profits to the military industries and the firms
with reconstruction contracts at the expense of 20,000 US military casualties
and tens of thousands of Iraqi civilian casualties.
The Republican Party is a loser, because its hidebound support for the war is
isolating the party from public opinion.
The Democratic Party is a loser, because its cowardly acquiescence in a war
that is opposed by the majority of its members is making the party irrelevant.
The latest polls show that a majority of Americans believe the US cannot win
against the Iraq insurgency. The majority support withdrawal and the
redirection of war spending to rebuilding New Orleans. Despite the clarity of
the public's wishes, the Republican Party continues to support the unpopular
war.
With the exceptions of Reps. Cynthia McKinney and John Conyers, Democrats fled
the scene of the Sept. 24 antiwar rally in Washington DC. The cynical Democrats
are apparently owned by the same interest groups that own the Republicans and
are refusing the mantle of majority party that the electorate is offering to
the party that will end the war.
The Bush administration is churning out red ink in excess of $1 trillion
annually. The federal budget deficit is approaching $500 billion. The US trade
deficit is approaching $700 billion.
The budget deficit is being financed by foreigners, primarily Asians who now
hold enough US government debt to exercise power over US interest rates and the
value of the dollar whenever they decide to use the power that Bush has placed
in their hands.
The trade deficit is being financed by turning over the ownership of US assets
and future income streams to foreigners, making Americans forever poorer from
the loss of accumulated wealth.
For the time being, China is willing to accumulate US assets as a way of taking
over our consumer markets, attracting US manufacturing industry with cheap
labor subsidized by artificial currency values, and gaining our technology.
China's strategy is to over-value the US dollar in order to encourage the
transfer of US economic capabilities to China. China's strategy gives
artificial value to the dollar and keeps US interest rates at an artificial low.
The values of US stocks, bonds, and real estate depend on the support that
Asians' economic strategies provide the dollar and US interest rates. As Asia
achieves its goal of preeminence in manufacturing, innovation, and product
development, the strategy will change. Once China completes its acquisition of
US capabilities, it will no longer have a reason to support the dollar.
When the dollar goes, it will affect costs, profits, interest rates and living
standards in dramatic ways. Costs and interest rates will soar, and profits,
living standards, equity values, bond prices and real estate will plummet.
These unpleasant events await only Asia's decision to curtail its support for
US red ink. That will happen when this support no longer serves Asia's interest.
When Asia pulls the plug on the dollar, the US government will find that
monetary and fiscal policy are powerless to offset the consequences.
Compared to US budget and trade deficits, terrorists are a minor concern. The
greatest danger that the US faces is the dollar's loss of reserve currency
role. This would be an impoverishing event, one from which the US would not
recover.
An intelligent government sincerely concerned with homeland security would find
a way to halt the global labor arbitrage that is stripping the American economy
of high value-added jobs and manufacturing capability, thereby causing the US
trade deficit to explode. The loss of tax base that results when US companies
outsource jobs and relocate production abroad makes it ever more difficult to
balance a budget strained by war, natural disasters, and demographic impact on
Social Security and Medicare.
Global labor arbitrage is rapidly dismantling the ladders of upward mobility
and thereby endangering American political stability. This threat is far
greater than any Osama bin Laden can mount.
Time is running out for Republicans and Democrats to escape from the
distraction of a pointless war and to focus on the real threats that endanger
the United States of America.
Paul Craig Roberts has held a number of academic appointments and has
contributed to numerous scholarly publications. He served as Assistant
Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. His graduate economics
education was at the University of Virginia, the University of California at
Berkeley, and Oxford University. He is coauthor of The Tyranny of Good Intentio
ns. He can be reached at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------
Just sent this message back to my friend living in texas whom I trust. Have
known him for 4 years and he is not a liar. Guess its getting pretty tense
down there. It looks like we must be getting ready for "something" big
happening or they wouldn't be here. Is everyone prepared???? It could get
squirrly. P
Johnnie, keep me apprised and here is my phone number if they cut your computer
line.
Oh, just a thought, remember when all those European countries offered to come
over and help??? Well we turned them down and made a big deal about doing it,
yet here we know nothing about the Mexican Army coming onto our soil from
either the President or the so called mainstream press. Its people like you
getting the word out. Thanks for giving us the heads up on it. They would
gladly shoot us in a texas minute. P
----- Original Message -----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: Military choppers going south.
Pat,
I hope that you have a map of the southwestern states including Texas... It has
been on TV past few days that since the fall of the Alamo in 1836, it was the
first time that the Mexican Army had (in mass) crossed the Rio Grande river,
border separating the U.S. from Mexico, and they were mostly an Engineering and
Medical group bringing equipment, (supposedly) to help with the aftermath of
"Rita". Yesterday, 9-27-05, they showed them returning back across the Rio
Grande coming from the Houston area.....It has been big news that the Mexican
Army, in uniform and with their weapons, came across our borders.... I would
guess with the blessing of bush.
I am saying that the influx of Mexican men coming into the U.S. ( dressed in
civies, western clothing, day laborer work clothes, etc.) Our take on this is
that they could be part, and I say again, COULD BE, able bodied men of the
Mexican army. We find it very strange that during an emergency or some sort of
an alert, we have a new large group of what looks to be Mexicans that could
very well be in an army, they seem to have that military bearing about them.
Having spent a lifetime in the military, one ex-military man can spot someone
that carries themselves in that manor.
We don't know what it is with the choppers... It could be anything this day in
time and as fast as things are happening who knows....The group of people that
I know, we try to stay on top of anything that looks like it could develop into
something. We are survivalist and will survive. There has been a lot of strange
activity lately and it isn't looking to good.....just can't put our finger on
what it is yet but we are staying alert for anything possible. These 2
hurricanes have been an eye opener for us as to how slow or how fast this
government can or will work.... bush will bankrupt this country just flying
everywhere in Air Force 1, ($6,000.00 per hour for that plane alone, 7 trips to
Texas in less than a week and he tells us to conserve fuel.
-------Original Message-------
From: Pat Rydz
Date: 09/28/05 18:32:17
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Military choppers going south.
JW, what do you think it is??? I am not sure I understand what you just
said. Are you saying that the Mexican army has crossed our borders and
some are shopping at walmart???
Are you also saying that our military has sent a series of helicopters to
that area to route them out of there???? Or are they giving aid to them???
I am unsure what exactly your saying here. Please retell it a little
differently so I understand. You know, I am a bit slow. LOL P
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 3:44 PM
Subject: Re: Military choppers going south.
> Pat, Just had an email from a friend west of me in Rocksprings, Texas
> reporting many groups of 2 choppers, in each flight ,heading south toward
> Del Rio, Texas and they are showing the Mexican Army truck convoy that came
> into the state going back across the border into Mexico.
>
> Last few evenings at Walmart there have been a lot of small groups of 3-4
> doing what we see as first time shopping here in centeral Texas. They pay
> for their large orders with what looks to be new minted bills, sometimes
> each one with 2 loaded carts. All look to be clean cut and of military age
> and fitness. Makes us wonder???
>
> Johnnie T. #1 Swabbie
---------------------------------
Congress Members
Demand Halliburton
Suspension
>From Halliburton Watch.org
News Release
Contact Bill Goold
202 225-5161 or 202 226-4055
9-27-5
http://www.rense.com/general67/halibit.htm
---------------------------------
Bush's Depression: Been There, Reported That
By DOUG THOMPSON
Sep 28, 2005, 06:38
Staffers call White House a "hellhole" and "insane asylum"
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7445.shtml
Depressed and demoralized White House staffers say working at 1600 Pennsylvania
Avenue is ¡°life in a hellhole¡± as they try to deal with a sullen, moody
President whose temper tantrums drive staffers crying from the room and bring
the business of running the country to a halt.
It's like working in an insane asylum, says one White House aide. People walk
around like they're in a trance. We're the dance band on the Titanic, playing
out our last songs to people who know the ship is sinking and none of us are
going to make it.
Increasing reports from the usually tight-lipped staff of the Bush
Administration talk of a West Wing dominated by gallows humor, long faces and a
depression that has all but paralyzed daily routines.
If POTUS (President of the United States) is on the road you can breathe a
little easier for the day, knowing that those with him are catching hell and
the mood will be a little easier in the Wing (West Wing) until he returns, says
another aide.
Capitol Hill Blue began reporting on Bush's mood swings and erratic behavior in
June 2004 but the stories of an erratic, moody President circulating within the
White House were ignored by the mainstream media until recently. Now more and
more outlets have begun to report on what many administration staffers say is a
President out of control.
A president who normally thrives on tough talk and self-assurance finds himself
at what aides privately describe as a low point in office, one that is changing
the psychic and political aura of the White House, as well as its distinctive
political approach, Jim VandeHei and Peter Baker wrote in The Washington Post
over the weekend. Aides who never betrayed self-doubt now talk in private of
failures selling the American people on the Iraq war, the president's Social
Security plan and his response to Hurricane Katrina.
That sentiment is echoed by former Republican Speaker of the House Newt
Gingrich.
I think the Administration realizes the larger system has failed, Gingrich
says. They are not where they want to be on Iraq. Katrina was an absolute
failure."
It's a standing joke among the president's top aides: who gets to deliver the
bad news? Warm and hearty in public, Bush can be cold and snappish in private,
and aides sometimes cringe before the displeasure of the president of the
United States, or, as he is known in West Wing jargon, POTUS, Evan Thomas wrote
in Newsweek on September 19. Thomas talked to ¡°several aides who did not wish
to be quoted because it might displease the president.
Thomas went on to report Bush can be petulant about dissent; he equates
disagreement with disloyalty. After five years in office, he is surrounded
largely by people who agree with him¡­Late last week, Bush was, by some
accounts, down and angry. But another Bush aide described the atmosphere inside
the White House as "strangely surreal and almost detached." At one meeting
described by this insider, officials were oddly self-congratulatory, perhaps in
an effort to buck each other up. Life inside a bunker can be strange,
especially in defeat.
To regular readers of this web site, this should sound all too familiar. Here
is what we reported on June 4, 2004:
Worried White House aides paint a portrait of a man on the edge, increasingly
wary of those who disagree with him and paranoid of a public that no longer
trusts his policies in Iraq or at home. It reminds me of the Nixon days, says a
longtime GOP political consultant with contacts in the White House. Everybody
is an enemy; everybody is out to get him. That's the mood over there.
Last year, the naysayers said we got it wrong.
But they got it wrong.
Again.
And we got it right and ahead of everyone else.
Again.
Yes, we're gloating. We all too often read reports in the big boys and have a
feeling of deja vu because we're already been there and reported that.
---------------------------------
Noam Chomsky - Controlled Asset Of The New
World Order
Commentary
By Daniel L. Abrahamson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
9-27-5
"Since 9-11, he has steadfastly refused to discuss the evidence of government
complicity and prior knowledge. Furthermore, he claims that the Council on
Foreign Relations (CFR), Bilderberg Committee, and Trilateral Commission are
"nothing organizations." When critiquing poverty, he never mentions the Federal
Reserve and their role in manipulating the cycle of debt. Similarly, he claims
the CIA was never a rogue organization and is an innocent scapegoat; that JFK
was killed by the lone assassin Lee Harvey Oswald; that the obvious vote fraud
in 2004 did not occur..."
Noam Chomsky is often hailed as America's premier dissident intellectual, a
fearless purveyor of truth fighting against media propaganda, murderous U.S.
foreign policy, and the crimes of profit-hungry transnational corporations.
He enjoys a slavish cult-like following from millions leftist students,
journalists, and activists worldwide who fawn over his dense books as if they
were scripture. To them, Chomsky is the supreme deity, a priestly master whose
logic cannot be questioned.
However, as one begins to examine the interviews and writings of Chomsky, a
different picture emerges. His books, so vociferously lauded in leftist
circles, appear to be calculated disinformation designed to distract and
confuse honest activists. Since the 1960's, Chomsky has acted as the premier
Left gatekeeper, using his elevated status to cover up the major crimes of the
global elite.
His formula over the years has stayed consistent: blame "America" and
"corporations" while failing to examine the hidden Globalist overclass which
pulls the strings, using the U.S. as an engine of creation and destruction.
Then after pinning all the worlds ills on American imperialism, Chomsky offers
the solution of world government under the United Nations.
In his book "The Conspirator's Hierarchy," Dr. John Coleman named Chomsky as a
deep cover CIA agent working to undermine social protest groups. Certainly Dr.
Coleman's claims appear validated by an honest review of Chomsky's role as a
Left gatekeeper.
Since 9-11, he has steadfastly refused to discuss the evidence of government
complicity and prior knowledge. Furthermore, he claims that the Council on
Foreign Relations (CFR), Bilderberg Committee, and Trilateral Commission are
"nothing organizations." When critiquing poverty, he never mentions the Federal
Reserve and their role in manipulating the cycle of debt.
Similarly, he claims the CIA was never a rogue organization and is an innocent
scapegoat; that JFK was killed by the lone assassin Lee Harvey Oswald; that the
obvious vote fraud in 2004 did not occur; and that peak oil is real and good
for humanity.
What he does advocate is population control, gun control, support for
U.N.E.S.C.O., and the end of national sovereignty in favor of a one-world
government under the UN. In other words, the major goals of the New World
Order.
Chomsky's role in propaganda paradigm is much like that of Karl Marx: to
present a false liberation ideology which actually supports the desired
solutions of the elite. Marx pointed out the inequalities and brutality of
capitalism and then advocated a one world bank, army, and government with the
abolition of private property and religion; in other words, the major goals
known of the New World Order.
Tens of millions of activists worldwide still remain trapped by this scam,
failing to recognize the inherent autocratic and elitist structures of
Marxism-Leninism or the newer incarnation under Chomsky.
The Globalist elites and their army of social scientists at the Tavistock
Institute understand that people are going to question the inequities of the
current economic system. For example, why is wealth distributed so unequally
between classes and countries? Why are those living in third world nations
allowed to die from preventable diseases and starvation? Why does the U.S.
government sponsor and direct such murderous foreign policy? Why was America
attacked on 9-11?
In other words, why is the world embroiled in such violence? Who is behind all
this suffering? And most importantly, what solutions would relieve the poverty
and destruction plaguing the worldwide population?
Enter Chomsky, the controlled opposition, to play the role of re-direct agent.
He discusses a mere fraction of the real elite manipulation and then quickly
pushes his followers into dead-end solutions and alienating rhetoric. Chomsky's
hero status is further amplified by Left gatekeeper publications like Z
Magazine, DemocracyNow!, The Progressive, and The Nation.
Is it a coincidence that all of those magazines receive major funding from
Globalist front-groups like the Rockefeller Foundation, Ford Foundation,
Carnegie Endowment, and MacArthur Foundation? Chomsky may be the head
gatekeeper, but he works alongside a network of fellow Globalist assets like
Amy Goodman who do their best to appear radical while avoiding all the hardcore
issues and deliberately leading the Left into oblivion.
The following analysis will show that Chomsky, a deep cover agent for the New
World Order, a master of black propaganda whose true motives become clear with
a sober and honest examination.
911
Noam Chomsky has acted as the premier Left gatekeeper in the aftermath of the
9-11 crimes, lashing out at the 9-11 truth movement and claiming any
suggestions of government complicity are fabrications. The "radical" Chomsky
takes a position so deeply rooted in denial that it makes the staged 9-11
whitewash commission look like an honest study. He belligerently refuses to
discuss any of the massive evidence proving government foreknowledge and
participation in the crimes, claiming it would destroy the activist movements
worldwide:
"If the left spends its time on this, that's the end of the left, in my
opinion: the mainstream would be utterly delighted. It is highly likely that
nothing significant will be found. And if -- which I very greatly doubt --
something is found that would quickly send everyone in Washington to the death
chamber, the left is unlikely to emerge triumphant."
In other words, Chomsky is telling his followers to ignore the evidence because
according to him, none exists. However even if there is massive evidence,
responsible activists should ignore it because it would be "the end of the
Left." Chomsky's role as a 9-11 gatekeeper goes even further as he denies each
piece of evidence individually. The following examples should suffice:
1) As most honest 9-11 researchers know, 7 of the accused 19 hijackers are
alive, proving the official story is a fabrication. Many of the remaining 12
were trained as U.S. Air Force bases and CIA-connected Huffman Aviation. Many
of the accused "religious fanatics" acted more like degenerate contract agents,
as they flashed wads of cash, visited strip clubs, drank profusely, blew
cocaine, smoked weed, cavorted with strippers and had strange meetings in the
drug-rich Florida keys.
Men like Mohammed Atta fit the MO of an undercover CIA drug runner: a man
trained at U.S. Air Force bases, fluent in many languages, able to evade INS
regulations, working with drug dealers, and receiving wired bank funds from
CIA-linked Pakistani intelligence. There remains no photographic evidence of
these supposed hijackers ever getting on the planes (walking through airport
security does not count). Furthermore, the autopsy list of Flight 77 which
supposedly hit the Pentagon listed none of the accused hijackers.
Regarding the evidence of government complicity in training the hijackers,
Chomsky wrote the following:
"Nothing empirical is impossible. Thus, it is conceivable that everyone in the
White House is totally insane. And in my opinion, that's what they would have
had to be to try something that would have been very likely to turn into an
utter fiasco, and if by some miracle had succeeded, would almost certainly have
leaked, so that they would all be facing the death sentence. Possible, but not
likely."
2) What about the unprecedented NORAD stand down on 9-11 which broke standard
operation procedure? Over 67 times in 2001, NORAD had dispatched jets when they
deviated from their flight path. In 1999, when golfer Payne Stewart's single
engine Lear in depressurized, NORAD planes were flying around the vessel in 20
minutes.
But on 9-11, Ben Sliney, in his first day on the job as hijacking coordinator
for the FAA, delayed calls to NORAD. Meanwhile NORAD ran at least 7 hijacking
drills that morning like Operation Vigilant Guardian where commercial jets
crashed into government buildings in Manhattan, Washington DC, and Virginia.
These "mock" drills, designed to give live on 9-11, helped to distract the
honest people within NORAD and the FAA, and to evade suspicion from patriotic
investigators within the CIA, FBI, and NSA's Echelon network.
Of the subject of the NORAD stand down, Chomsky wrote the following:
"Whether NORAD followed SOP, I have no idea, not having investigated the
matter. I think the case is very weak, and diverts people from the really
serious issues."
3) How about the document called "Operation Northwoods" signed off in 1962 by
the Joint Chiefs of Staff like Generals Lemnitzer and Landsdale? These men,
sworn to protect the Constitution, devised a plan to create false-flag
terrorism in order to engineer a war with Cuba. Their treasonous plans included
the following:
- "Hijacking attempts against civil air and surface craft could appear to
continue as harassing measures condoned by the Government of Cuba."
- "Exploding a few plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots, the arrest of Cuban
agents and the release of prepared documents substantiating Cuban involvement
also would be helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible government."
- "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba . . . casualty
lists in U.S. newspapers cause a helpful wave of indignation."
This document was discovered in the National Archives and has been the subject
of mainstream articles by ABCNEWS and others. It stands as clear evidence that
the U.S. government has designed plans to engineer terrorist attacks and blame
them on foreign enemies. Yet Noam Chomsky does not think the Northwoods
document matters:
"Operation Northwoods example is only one of many reasons for being skeptical
about this: it doesn't even come close, and it was not carried out.
Furthermore, there is nothing in history that even remotely resembles what is
being proposed. Of course, that does not show that the thesis is impossible:
nothing could show that, by definition. And if someone can put together some
evidence and refute the arguments as to why it is extraordinarily unlikely,
then the matter will be worth pursuing."
Chomsky's role as the chief 9-11 gatekeeper proves he is distracting his
leftist followers from the truth. Instead of facing the clear facts, he claims
that 19 hijackers did it and that al-Qaeda is a real terrorist enemy. When
presented with documented evidence, from living hijacker patsies to the NORAD
stand down, he simply claims it doesn't exist. He resorts to emotional "they
would never do it" appeals in order to deny the obvious.
Chomsky is exhibiting far more than logical skepticism, but instead is actively
engaging in disinformation.
9-11 Prior Knowledge
Chomsky denial of government complicity in the crimes of September 11 is one
thing, but he goes further, claiming the government had no prior knowledge of
the attacks. Mind you, this is a position even weaker than Michael Moore's
tepid Fahrenheit 9-11, which at least tacitly suggested a degree of prior
knowledge.
Chomsky's position is untenable. For a man who prides himself on science and
logic, his steadfast refusal to acknowledge mainstream media reports finds him
using arguments similar to Holocaust deniers; one can show them photographs,
videos, testimony, and physical evidence but the burden of proof is impossible.
Such is the case with Chomsky who ignores the many government admissions of
prior knowledge widely available even in the 9-11 whitewash commission report.
Here is Noam Chomsky writing on government prior knowledge:
"That tells us even less. Every intelligence agency is flooded, daily, with
information of very low credibility. In retrospect, one can sometimes pick out
pieces that mean something. At the time, that's a virtual impossibility. By
arguments like this we can prove that someone blew up the White House
yesterday."
If they did not have prior knowledge, why were Cheney and NORAD running drills
that morning where hijacked jets flew into buildings in New York, Washington DC
and Virginia? Also, wouldn't the NSA's Echelon network have picked up the
chatter?
Of course, Chomsky does not even admit the Echelon network exists. This despite
the NSA's openly acknowledged ability to monitor all phone calls, emails and
satellite communication with keyword software which can identify phrases and
immediately begin tracking the communication. This despite their admitted bases
at Fort Meade, with sister sites in the UK, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and
other unknown locations.
Students of the intelligence world know full well that the NSA's Echelon
network picked up the chatter for weeks before the attacks. In fact, the NSA
admitted it, saying that on September 10 agents intercepted calls from
hijackers but, *ahem*, did not translate them until after the attacks. Such
admissions are red herrings, clearly designed to excuse massive prior knowledge
at tops levels of the intelligence circles.
What about the President Daily Briefing given to Bush in late August which
discussed the threat of hijacked jets? What about intelligence groups like Able
Danger and FBI agents like Robert Wright who warned of the flight school
trainees? What about FBI agent John O'Neill's investigation into Al-Qaeda
financing which was quashed by Bush? What about attorney David Schippers who
desperately tried to warn Ashcroft about the impending attacks? Why was the CIA
admittedly tracking the accused hijackers since 2000? Why was FEMA running
drills in Manhattan that morning out of WTC-7? Why did PNAC documents like
"Rebuilding America's Defenses" call for helpful Pearl Harbor style attacks?
Those are just a smattering of the mountain of evidence proving beyond any
reasonable doubt that the U.S. government had prior knowledge. But Chomsky must
deny these, because his role is to mislead and distract while chastising the
9-11 truth movement.
CFR/Bilderberg/Trilateral Commission
More- http://rense.com/general67/noam.htm
---------------------------------
Government Technology Magazine PROPAGANDA!
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 3:49 PM
Subject: The Homeland Report 05.09.27
Tuesday, 27 September 2005
FEMA Not On Alert
"The Department is in contempt of Congress. If I were called by Congress to
testify on why public warnings did not go forward, it would only take one word:
FEMA" -- NASCIO Consultant Peter Ward.
New York State Finalizes $2 Billion Contract For Statewide Emergency Radio
Network
New York State CIO James T. Dillon announced that design and construction of
the state's new public safety radio network is set to begin.
Hurricane Rita Update and Images
Rita reached its peak intensity on September 22.
Protecting Agriculture
Illinois plans GIS to safeguard against attacks or respond to disease outbreaks.
DOJ Awards $26 Million to Enhance State Criminal Justice Records
Funds to improve the completeness, quality and accessibility of the nation's
criminal record systems.
Federal Official Named for Hurricane Rita Response
Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff has designated Rear Admiral Larry
Hereth, U.S. Coast Guard, as Principal Federal Official (PFO) for incident
management purposes during the response and recovery operations for Hurricane
Rita in Texas.
Emergency Declarations Help States Cope
Fully 45 states, plus the District of Columbia, are now in a federally
recognized state of emergency.
USFA Opens Call Center In Support of Firefighters Helping Firefighters
The call center has been created to accept calls from departments with
equipment to be donated to departments that have lost theirs.
TSA Launches Pilot Project to Track Hazmat Trucks
TSA awards $3 million contract.
New York City Awarded $6 Million to Build Regional Public Safety Radio Network
Grant will create seamless radio system for New York Ci ty, Westchester,
Nassau, Bergen, Hudson and Essex counties and portions of Suffolk and Passaic
counties.
---------------------------------
Yahoo! for Good
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/VpgUKB/pzNLAA/cUmLAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
