Paul, have you considered starting your own discussion group? --- In [email protected], "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [Moderator: this poster, Paul, is complaining > about being put on moderated status in this forum. > > That means that his posts are held in a que awaiting > my approval for publication to this forum which > is PRIVATELY owned though accessable for public > paticipation. Paul was put on moderated status > in this forum due to his REPEATED violations > of the agreement by which anyone can post here. > > Below is his rant, posted to this forum, in response. > > > Forum owner/moderator, > -Terry Liberty Parker > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian > > PaulSez ] > > > > You can shove your non-libertarian comments up your ass Terry. There > is absolutely NOTHING unlibertarian about dishing out insults, > especially to those who richly deserve them. > > [Moderator: except when they violate the terms > by which you get to use a particular forum ] > > > If one of us isn't a libertarian, it's the one who censors others > because he doesn't like what they say or the way they say it. Also, > if you want to talk about statism, you like being the dictator of the > group here. You're fond of claiming you have no rules....well you > have no rules other than having everyone follow your arbitrary whims. > > [Moderator: Paul apparently doesn't accept the concept > of forum proprietorship (aka property rights) and believes > that HIS self indulgent 'freedom' is not to be bound by > another's just rights. > > see: Your Freedom and the Rights of Others > at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/22990 ] > > > > --- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Paul's posts are now being moderated, > > since he apparently has decided not to > > STOP his use of ad hominem here! > > > > Ad hominem (attacking the messenger > > instead of message) is a violation of > > terms of use for this forum, as set by > > its owner, me. Paul's continued use of > > ad hominem in this forum is, btw, an > > unlibertarian act. Also, ad hominem > > generally demonstrates incapacity > > (or at least unwillingness) to competently > > respond to advocacies. > > > > Moderate yourself or you'll be put on moderated status :( > > > > Owner/moderator, > > -Terry Liberty Parker > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Jeffrey, > > > > > > Being an asshole does not disqualify you from being a libertarian. > > > Not supporting the non-aggression principle does. Whether or not > > you > > > like me personally does not change the fact that I am 100% > > > libertarian. Nobody on earth is more libertarian than be because > > > libertarianism is a boolean function. There are no degrees of > > > libertarianism. You are one or you're not, and in my particular > > case, > > > I am. > > > > > > I have little to no tolerance for those who are too dim to grasp > > > libertarianism like Boyd, Melissa, Eric Dondero, and countless other > > > trolls who come here to screw things up. > > > > > > Personally I find you to be a pretentious asshole, but you've shown > > > that you are libertarian so even though I dislike you personally, I > > > can tolerate you. Your opinion of me doesn't matter. I'd have to > > > respect you or care about you for that to matter and I think we both > > > know where you are on my respect and admiration scale. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Jeffrey Smith" > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > First, she was a bitchy and nasty whiner, second, nobody on > > earth is > > > > > more libertarian than me, and lastly, that especially applies > > to you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, Paul. Lots of people are more libertarian than you, because, > > > > unlike you, they respect the people they interact with, and they > > > > realize that they themselves are fallible and that sometimes they > > are > > > > wrong. Merely because a person does not agree with you is not a > > > > reason to attack them. And it may be because you are the one who > > is > > > > wrong. Not even the Pope claims to be right one hundred percent > > of > > > > the time. > > > > > > > > You, on the other hand, resemble the nether human orifice. > > > > > > > > Sorry if this is an ad hominem, but it needs to be said at least > > once. > > > > > > > > Jeffrey Smith > > > > > > > > > >
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/VpgUKB/pzNLAA/cUmLAA/KlSolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
