Yes, I would tend to agree.
_____ mark robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Good points, but maybe "material inequality" could better be > called "material variety". Regarding Terry's example of hit-men > for hire, are you saying there's something in the definition of > capitalism that excludes such transactions? I dont think material variety is appropriate because you ultimate are talking about wealth. in my definition, anything that is legal trade is capitalism. if hit men are legal then its capitalism. if not its just crime. Vic _____ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
