Anna,
OK, you communicated with your unborn fetus better than most can
communicate the born. Then my questions were even more relevant.
If you harmed or risked your fetus in any way, you did it with
full knowledge / premeditation / malice. So once again:
While pregnant, did you do any of the unhealthy things I asked
earlier? Did you smoke, drink, eat imperfectly, exercise
imperfectly, expose yourself to less-than-perfectly-healthy
conditions or risks, see your doctor on a
less-than-perfectly-regular basis, etc, etc. It is very
suspicious that you did not answer earlier AND that your baby was
premature. Under your own preference, that would be a good basis
for an investigation into whether you violated the rights of
(harmed) your citizen-fetus (caused its premature birth). And
here are some more pertinent pregnant-questions: Did you maintain
an imperfect weight? Did you conceive at an imperfect age? Did
you conceive out of wedlock? Please cooperate with this
investigation.
-Mark
_____
I was told my unborn son that he would be born prematurely, and
he was. What language? In dreams and telepathically. If you
think that there is only one language in this world and it must
be spoken, you lack education. Sound is not the best nor the
fastest way to send or receive information. Minds are faster than
the speed of light etc....
I did what my unborn son asked me for, diet, rest and everything
else. This is why he made it. He taught me how. My son as born
at 6 month, 3 month prematurely, but alive and healthy.
On the same ward there were babies born at 5 month and one at 4.5
month. At the age, when to some of you, a baby is still a fetus,
or a worm
which can be aborted. Nevertheless, babies at 4.5 month did have
brains and could dream and communicate with their parents the
moment they left the womb. And they were fully conscious and
aware too.
I think that the issue of abortion should be left to women to
decide. Nevertheless, the decisions must be made on the basis of
humanitarian approach to life. But you are defining an unborn
child as a parasite and a worm. It is more than obvious that
without this fake definition, you would have to call it a
murder.
Do not gte me wrong though. I am for abortion up to a certain
age, when there is no brain yet and no mind, thus no person.
But I strongly believe that once a fetus has a developed brain,
it becomes an individual person. Only very defective babies
should be removed then. I do not believe that society should
support birth of defective people. Nevertheless, this would be
up to the courts or doctors to decide individual cases.
Even a libertarian society must be founded on laws. A law not to
kill, a law not to steal and so on....
What is your moral reason to exempt unborn babies from it?
Any person which makes unprotected sex with another person,
should understands that what he is doing, is reproducing life.
The purpose of life is to reproduce and protect life. This is
your only natural law you have, yet you are rejecting it as a
fancy.
Anna
_____
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
AIDS in India: A "lurking bomb." Click and help stop AIDS now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/VpTY2A/lzNLAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
