--- In [email protected], "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> All life is not human life. A fetus is living tissue and cells, but
> does not have human life. But even if it was a human life it would
> make no difference because nothing inside the body of a person has
any
> rights regardless of what it is.
>
> A fetus has the potential for human life but does not have human
life.
> Notice I didn't use the word "baby". That is because a fetus is not
> a baby.
Why does nothing inside the body of a person not have rights if that
something is a human life? A fetus is a separate genetic entity with
his or her own DNA. DNA is what makes a person who they are. Everyone
has DNA. Reason dictates that a fetus is a separate human life. I have
never heard a pregnant woman refer to her baby who is still in her
womb as a fetus btw. The word fetus is a medical term for a baby at an
early stage of developement in the womb. I have never heard someone
tell a child that a pregnant woman has a fetus in her belly but have
heard people tell young children that a pregnant woman has a baby
inside her. You say the same thing over and over about a fetus not
being a human life. Why not open your mind to reason and logic? I have
not resorted to emotionalism when discussing abortion. I have used
reason to reach the conclusion I have.
$
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
