REPOSTS ON: 11-28-AD2005 Archived at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LLNews5 Out:07:02am Join and check http://groups.yahoo.com/group/govtwatch4 for the BEST in the latest headlines and news! HTML Copies of this newsletter are in LLNews5 and http://groups.yahoo.com/group/worldcom To be cut from more mai lings just email me back at this address [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since Yahoo ID's are sometimes DELETED, USE ABOVE EMAIL ADDRESS TO CORRESPOND ^ ^ Amerika (Part 1) (DivX).avi Amerika (part 2 the final 6 hours) Those who note 'CONDITIONING' movies will remember the aired only ONCE mini-series 'AMERIKA' starring Kris Kristopherson and Peter Urich showing the U.S. under Soviet military occupation. Those noting 'CONDITIONING' in police state movies like 'Demolition Man', 'The Running Man' and others should take note of http://www.AeonFlux.com and its movie release THIS FRIDAY depicting a 'futuristic' POLICE STATE. This movie is spawned from animated shorts and an animated series on the most CORRUPTING 'TV' channel of our youth... MTV. The Sci-Fi series features a female assasin / spy and sexual situations and ideology that could even make Klinton blush! Sex, Violence, Bio-weapons, death rays, Mind Control, Aliens, hoverdrone spies, CAMERAS, automated border control weaponry and more were covered in the few episodes that aired and are likely in the movie also from the promos I've seen. The series is now out on DVD just prior to the movie release for maximum sales. NOTEworthy is the first episode on Disk 1 where a few scenes were CUT from the MTV version I'd seen. The scenes cut mentioned: "TOTAL INFORMATION AWARENESS" which as we now know is a part of the globalist's 'wet dreams' as are many other things in this deviant series. You have to understand the twisted SEDUCTIVE allure of this genre and how different it is from most of MTV's programming. Much of their crap is pro-homosexual, mindless garbage devoid of any intellectual thought period. While this material certainly isn't 'healthy' it DOES require a few extra neurons to understand the goals of totalitarian minds and how to fight them. The problem with the 'heroine' Aeon is she doesn't fight for any ideology or creed but for PERSONAL motivations... Aeon Flux - Illuminati Logo (1 album) You're invited to view new Illuminati LOGO photos at the Gallery. Enjoy! - Larry http://www.kodakgallery.com/PostSignin.jsp?Uc=kpgn247.e7c44in&Uy=dl037s&Upost_signin=Slideshow.jsp%3Fmode%3Dfromshare&Ux=0 NOTE on the cover of the 'videogame' box that the 'logo' is another version of the ILLUMINATI logo.... The 'A' is actually the pyramid and Aeon's 'eye' is inside just as we've seen in countless other variations. As you can see above, I've saved FOUR examples from the website displaying this logo. Many 'worshippers' of the SATANIC illuminists like to show their loyalty and cleverness by variations on the pyramid / eye theme. It's POSSIBLE that 'MK-Ultra' style 'triggers' may be contained in the movie, game or both. So I wouldn't be surprised to see more STAGED SHOOTINGS soon to push the gun CONFISCATION agenda. We have to re-train ourselves to notice the very OBVIOUS, hidden in plain sight before our eyes. Many 'triggers' were in the first "MATRIX" movie that I believe triggered Columbine. This could be another. ANY movie can! I myself didn't notice the 'logo' until I played the 'trailer' the 2nd time. I find it interesting how I've been 'keyed' to absorb certain movies and material that are pieces to a larger puzzle over time. This I believe IS one of many. FYI to those who care. --------------------------------- Well, well, what have we here? Could it be HAARP firing a warning shot across the bow? 'Strong' quake jolts Iran, felt in Oman, U.A.E. An earthquake measuring at least magnitude-5.9 shook southern Iran Sunday and was felt as far away as Oman and the United Arab Emirates. Provincial officials said ten people were killed and more than 50 were injured. http://g.msn.com/0MN2ET7/2?http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10222850/from/ET/&&CM=EmailThis&CE=1 --------------------------------- http://philadelphians3.741.com/go2jail.html 'CIA plane lands in Istanbul' Published: 27/11/2005, 08:32 (UAE) Ankara AP: Turkish Transportation Minister Binali Yildirim yesterday confirmed that a plane, which a Turkish newspaper claimed was being used by the CIA, landed in Istanbul last week. The Hurriyet newspaper reported yesterday that a plane, believed to have been destined for an alleged CIA secret prison, landed in Istanbul on November 15 on its way to the Netherlands. Yildirim confirmed the plane had landed in Istanbul, but not that the aircraft was being used by the CIA. "It is true that the airplane mentioned in the newspaper arrived at Sabiha Gokcen," Yildirim said. "It made a request to land for technical reasons. There were no passengers, just crew members," he said. "It landed on November 15, refuelled and continued on its way." Hurriyet said the DeHavilland airplane arrived at Istanbul's Sabiha Gokcen airport from Baku in Azerbaijan, and left for Amsterdam's Schiphol Airport the next day. It said the plane belonged to Path Corp, previously linked to the CIA. Asked whether the government would protest the plane's use of the Turkish airport, the minister said there was nothing unusual in the plane's landing at Sabiha Gokcen. "The plane says it needs to land to refuel and take care of technical needs. You cannot not give it the permission. You don't have the luxury of asking what the plane is. You have to give it permission," he said. "It was one of several planes that land at Sabiha Gokcen for technical reasons," he added. The Dutch government confirmed that a plane belonging to Path Corp landed at Schiphol last week. The Council of Europe, the continent's main human rights watchdog, is looking into reports that the CIA set up secret jails in some European nations and transported terror suspects by covert flights. It has urged governments to fully provide information on the issue. The US has not confirmed the existence of the secret prisons, and Eastern European countries deny knowledge of covert facilities. Allegations German foreign minister expresses concern German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier expressed concern in remarks released yesterday about allegations that clandestine CIA flights carrying terror suspects may have passed through Frankfurt airport. "The foreign minister must evaluate facts, not newspaper reports," Steinmeier was quoted as saying by the Bild am Sonntag weekly. "What you can read there would indeed be a cause for concern. "That is why it is good that British foreign minister Jack Straw officially will ask in the name of the EU for information," Steinmeier said in an interview released ahead of its publication today. --------------------------------- I'll go to jail to print the truth about Bush and al-Jazeera London Telegraph/Boris Johnson | November 25 2005 It must be said that subsequent events have not made life easy for those of us who were so optimistic as to support the war in Iraq. There were those who believed the Government's rubbish about Saddam's Weapons of Mass Destruction. Then the WMD made their historic no-show. Some of us were so innocent as to suppose that the Pentagon had a well-thought-out plan for the removal of the dictator and the introduction of peace. Then we had the insurgency, in which tens of thousands have died. Some of us thought it was about ensuring that chemical weapons could never again be used on Iraqi soil. Then we heard about the white phosphorus deployed by the Pentagon. Some people believed that the American liberation would mean the end of torture in Iraqi jails. Then we had Abu Ghraib. Some of us thought it was all about the dissemination of the institutions of a civil society - above all a free press, in which journalists could work without fear of being murdered. Then we heard about the Bush plan to blow up al-Jazeera. Some of us feel that we have an abusive relationship with this war. Every time we get our hopes up, we get punched by some piece of bad news. We yearn to be told that we're wrong, that things are going to get better, that the glass is half full. That's why I would love to think that Dubya was just having one of his little frat-house wisecracks, when he talked of destroying the Qatar-based satellite TV station. Maybe he was only horsing around. Maybe it was a flippant one-liner, of the kind that he delivers before making one of his dramatic exits into the broom-closet. Perhaps it was a kind of Henry II moment: you know, who will rid me of this turbulent TV station? Maybe he had a burst of spacy Reagan-esque surrealism, like the time the old boy forgot that the mikes were switched on, and startled a press conference with the announcement that he was going to start bombing Russia in five minutes. Maybe Bush thought he was Kenny Everett. Perhaps he was playing Basil Brush. Boom boom. Who knows? But if his remarks were just an innocent piece of cretinism, then why in the name of holy thunder has the British state decreed that anyone printing those remarks will be sent to prison? We all hope and pray that the American President was engaging in nothing more than neo-con Tourette-style babble about blowing things up. We are quite prepared to believe that the Daily Mirror is wrong. We are ready to accept that the two British civil servants who have leaked the account are either malicious or mistaken. But if there is one thing that would seem to confirm the essential accuracy of the story, it is that the Attorney General has announced that he will prosecute anyone printing the exact facts. What are we supposed to think? The meeting between Bush and Blair took place on April 16, 2004, at the height of the US assault on Fallujah, and there is circumstantial evidence for believing that Bush may indeed have said what he is alleged to have said. We know that the administration was infuriated with the al-Jazeera coverage of the battle, and the way the station focused on the deaths of hundreds of people, including civilians, rather than the necessity of ridding the town of dangerous terrorists. We remember how Cheney and Rumsfeld both launched vehement attacks on the station, and accused it of aiding the rebels. We are told by the New York Times that there were shouty-crackers arguments within the administration, with some officials yelling that the channel should be shut down, and others saying that it would be better to work with the journalists in the hope of producing better coverage. We also recall that the Americans have form when it comes to the mass media outlets of regimes they dislike. They blew up the Kabul bureau of al-Jazeera in 2002, and they pulverised the Baghdad bureau in April 2003, killing one of the reporters. In 1999 they managed to blow up the Serb TV station, killing two make-up girls, in circumstances that were never satisfactorily explained. To be fair to the Americans, we must also accept that they had good grounds for resenting al-Jazeera. The station is hugely respected in the Arab world, has about 35 million viewers, and yet it gives what can only be described as a thoroughly Arab perspective of current affairs. It assists in the glorification of suicide bombers; it publishes the rambling tapes of Bin Laden and others among the world's leading creeps and whackos; it is overwhelmingly hostile to America and sceptical about the neo-con project of imposing western values and political systems in the Middle East. And yet however wrong you may think al-Jazeera is in its slant and its views, you must accept that what it is providing is recognisably journalism. It is not always helpful to the American cause in Iraq, but then nor is the BBC; and would anybody in London or Washington suggest sending a Tomahawk into White City? Well, they might, but only as a joke. Exhausted Western leaders, living in the nightmare of a media-dominated democracy, are allowed to make jokes about blowing up journalists. I seem to remember that when I was sent to Belgrade to cover the Nato attacks, Tony Blair told the then proprietor of The Daily Telegraph that he would "tell Nato to step up the bombing!" Ho ho ho. But if there is an ounce of truth in the notion that George Bush seriously proposed the destruction of al-Jazeera, and was only dissuaded by the Prime Minister, then we need to know, and we need to know urgently. We need to know what we have been fighting for, and there is only one way to find out. The Attorney General's ban is ridiculous, untenable, and redolent of guilt. I do not like people to break the Official Secrets Act, and, as it happens, I would not object to the continued prosecution of those who are alleged to have broken it. But we now have allegations of such severity, against the US President and his motives, that we need to clear them up. If someone passes me the document within the next few days I will be very happy to publish it in The Spectator, and risk a jail sentence. The public need to judge for themselves. Sunlight is the best disinfectant. If we suppress the truth, we forget what we are fighting for, and in an important respect we become as sick and as bad as our enemies. --------------------------------- Iranian president calls for war crimes charges on US By: breakingnews.ie on: 26.11.2005 Best form of defence is .... Attack is the best form of defence. Note every time the US opens up on Ahmadinejad, he returns with double the force double the public embarrassment. Look I really like this guy. Like Hugo Chávez of Venezuela ... he does the same thing ... probably better. Saddam was (when he was alive) a great world leader ... Now we have two such men Hugo Chávez and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Neal Iran's president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called for the Bush administration to be tried on war crimes charges related to Iraq and denounced the West for its stance on Iran's controversial nuclear programme, state-run television reported today. "You, who have used nuclear weapons against innocent people, who have used uranium ordnance in Iraq should be tried as war criminals in courts," Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said in an apparent reference to the US. Ahmadinejad didn't elaborate, but he was apparently referring to the US military's use of artillery shells packed with depleted uranium, which is far less radioactive than natural uranium and is left over from the process of enriching uranium for use as nuclear fuel. Since the 2003 start of the Iraq war, US forces have reportedly fired at least 120 tons of shells packed with depleted uranium, which is an extremely dense material used by the US and British militaries for tank armour and armour-piercing weapons. Once fired, the shells melt, vaporise and turn to dust. "Who in the world are you to accuse Iran of suspicious nuclear armed activity?" asked the Iranian president during a nationally televised ceremony marking the 36th anniversary of the establishment of the volunteer Basij paramilitary force. Iran has been under intense pressure to curb its nuclear programme, which the US claims is part of an effort to produce nuclear weapons. Iran denies such claims and says its nuclear programme is peaceful and aimed at generating electricity. But it insists that it has the right to develop its nuclear programme, including enrichment of nuclear fuel. On Thursday, the 35-board members of the International Atomic Energy Agency met on Iran's nuclear file after the US and Europe warned of UN Security Council action, accusing Iran of having documents that show how to produce parts of nuclear warheads. Iran has temporarily stopped its enrichment programme, but negotiations between it and Britain, France and Germany broke off in August after Tehran unfroze another part of its programme - the conversion of raw uranium into the gas that is used as the feeder stock in enrichment. Iran has also rejected European calls to halt work at its uranium conversion facility near city of Isfahan in central Iran. Ahmadinejad rejected Western concerns over his country's nuclear programme. "They say Iran has to stop its peaceful nuclear activity since there is a probability of diversion while we are sure that they are developing and testing (nuclear weapons) every day," Ahmadinejad said. "They speak as if they are the lords of the world." http://www.breakingnews.ie/2005/11/26/story232183.html -- Visit my Website at ... http://iron-clay.cloudnine.net.nz/one_world_government.html See my "Why Come Out" page here ... http://iron-clay.cloudnine.net.nz/why_come_out.html But if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet to warn the people and the sword comes and takes the life of one of them, that man will be taken away because of his sin, but I will hold the watchman accountable for his blood." - Eze 33:6 To be added to future mailings place "Please add" in the subject line. To be removed from future mailings place "REMOVE" in the subject line. and email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------- Police State http://usa.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/23118 Writers Threatened by Australian Anti-Terror Laws by Gideon Polya (Thursday November 24 2005) "These draconian Anti-Terrorism Laws will threaten free speech and the integrity of Australian teachers, researchers, schools and universities - and hence profoundly corrupt the next generation of Australians." A vocal humanitarian writer and scientist, I have been publicly identified in an expert and humane submission to the Senate Committee Inquiry into the proposed Australian Anti-Terrorism Laws [1] as threatened by the "sedition" provisions of these laws on account of my recent broadcast on Australian complicity in Iraq mass mortality on ABC Radio National. [2] Right-wing political and media hysteria over a "terror threat" to Australia has led to installation of draconian Anti-Terrorism Laws with even stronger laws set to be passed before Christmas 2005. An Australian Senate Committee enquiring into the new Anti-Terrorism Laws has posted 276 submissions on the Web.[3] These Anti-Terrorism laws - and particularly their broad-ranging "sedition" provisions - threaten Australian non-Europeans, Muslims, journalists, writers, academics and universities. After considering the "sedition" provisions, a brilliant linguistics researcher (in submission #84) considers that Professor Noam Chomsky, Professor Walden Bello, Dr Gideon Polya, brilliant mainstream but anti-war and humanitarian Australian cartoonist Michael Leunig and himself (by repeating their views and perhaps even listening to them) have broken the proposed "sedition" laws. The Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) recently broadcast a top legal opinion that outstanding expatriate Australian journalist John Pilger had also broken the "sedition" provisions by his forthright comments on Iraq (potentially 7 years in prison under the new Australian Anti-Terror laws). The existing Anti-Terrorism Laws provide draconian imprisonment penalties, namely 1 year (for not surrendering your passport immediately), 3 years (for intentionally associating 2 times with a person who promotes a Government-proscribed organization), 5 years (for reporting the preventative detention without charge of someone), 5 years (for not being able to prove that you do not possess an "answer" or a "thing" demanded during interrogation), 10 years for being associated with a Government-proscribed organization) and 25 years (for leading such an organization). The proposed Anti-Terrorism Laws provide further draconian imprisonment penalties, namely 2 years (for revealing a Document Demand Order), 5 years (for contravening Control Orders that could involve home detention, wearing a tracking device, no work, restricted associations, no telephone, no internet and no possession of specific "things"), 5 years (for revealing Preventative Detention without charge of anyone), 7 years (for broad-ranging "sedition" offences, including not being able to prove that you did not intend to assist Australia's enemies or disturb the peace - noting that it is not possible in science to prove a negative) and life imprisonment (for donations that are thence transmitted to a Government-proscribed organization). Remarkably, for all the hysteria over the "terror threat", neither politicians nor media have given any quantitative estimates of the actual risk. One of the submissions (that of myself, #112) does provide such information: for an Australian, the "annual probability of dying" is about 1 in 1,000,000 (at the hands of a Muslim terrorist), 1 in 100,000 (at the hands of a family member or acquaintance), 1 in 10,000 (from a car accident) and 1 in 1,000 (from cigarette smoking). My submission also quantifies the "body count" from non-state terrorism and state terrorism. Thus about 5,000 Western civilians have been murdered by Muslim terrorists and insurgents over the last 20 years. In contrast, the post-invasion avoidable mortality (excess mortality) in the Occupied Palestinian, Iraqi and Afghan Territories now totals 0.3, 0.5 and 1.6 million, respectively - this being corroborated by independent estimates of post-invasion under-5 infant mortality in these Occupied Territories of 0.2, 0.3 and 1.4 million, respectively. However the Australian Anti-Terrorism Laws, while not specifying Muslims, will in fact TARGET them because all 18 presently Government- proscribed organizations are Muslim. As with the "old" White Australia Policy and the "secret" New White Australia Policy, the Anti-Terrorism Laws will target Asians and Muslims by "secret executive interpretation". Thus Australian Jews will be free to serve as soldiers in the illegally-occupied West Bank or Syrian territories and free to donate money towards illegal Israeli settlements - while a peaceful Muslim could face life imprisonment for a charitable donation at a mosque. Australian media will simply NOT report the horrendous US Coalition "passive genocide" in the Occupied Iraqi and Afghan Territories now totalling 2.1 million post-invasion avoidable deaths in gross violation of the Geneva Conventions through the non-provision of life- sustaining requisites. NOR will Australian media report the 0.4 million post-2001 global drug deaths linked to the US Coalition restoration of the Taliban-destroyed Afghan opium industry (currently about 90% of global market share) - this death toll including 2,000 Australians, 1,200 Scots, 3,000 Canadians, 3,200 Britons and 50,000 Americans. I have told the Senate Committee of these things and also pointed out that the Anti-Terrorism Laws are actually "terrorist" themselves - they are achieving political ends through intimidation - and, indeed, by threatening pacifist and humanitarian anti-war activists (such as myself), will PROMOTE war and hence the continuing, DAILY death toll of 1,100 under-5 year old infants in the Occupied Iraqi and Afghan Territories. Humane principles and free speech aside, I have an immutable personal defence for resolutely exposing crimes against humanity: the Nazis wiped our family from Europe and it is impossible for me - as a humanist and scientist with this family history - to be party to any crimes against humanity or to denial, whether by omission or commission, of egregious crimes committed against ANY people. In addition to such scientific assessments of the relative effects of "jihadist" non-state terrorism and US state terrorism, my submission also mentioned dangers of this draconian legislation to Australia in relation to trade, tourism and overseas students. The Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade reports that in 2003-2004 the total value to Australia of exports of goods and services was $143 billion, of which international visitors consumed $17 billion and education services exports accounted for $6 billion. [4] Draconian, Muslim-targeting Anti-Terrorism Laws will discourage Asian visitors. The associated "sedition" laws will force teachers and academics (including humanities-, social science-, science- and law- based academics) to LIE BY OMISSION - why should about 300,000 overseas students pay an average of $20,000 per annum to be taught LIES by fearful Australian academics under threat of 7 year prison terms for broad-ranging "sedition" offences? Under EXISTING laws, a peaceful, US anti-war teacher Scott Parkin was recently hauled off the street, imprisoned for about a week without charge, deported with 2 escorts and then charged $12,000 for the trouble. The hysteria- and Islamophobia-driven, Police State Anti-Terrorism Laws will violate major international human and civil rights agreements (notably the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights). These draconian Anti-Terrorism Laws will threaten free speech and the integrity of Australian teachers, researchers, schools and universities - and hence profoundly corrupt the next generation of Australians. Driven by media lying and hysteria, Australia is about to become a proto-Nazi Police State. PLEASE INFORM EVERYONE. After 4 years, Australian David Hicks is still in abusive US imprisonment, allegedly for association with an Afghan regime that, but for the US-led Coalition, could have prevented 2,000 post-2001 Australian opioid drug deaths (and 0.4 million such deaths globally). Mainstream media will simply NOT report Coalition complicity in the restoration of the Taliban-destroyed Afghan opium industry that now produces 4,200 tonnes or 87% of the global supply. [5] Australian Nguyen Tuong Van is facing judicial murder in Singapore for carrying 400 grams of deadly heroin - but Singapore is a major investor and banker for Myanmar, a country that currently produces about 320 tonnes of precursor opium per annum. Those US Coalition leaders and agents responsible for the post-2001 restoration of the Taliban-destroyed Afghan opium industry and hence for 0.4 million post-2001 global opioid drug deaths should be identified, arraigned, tried and suitably punished. No Australians have died from "terrorist" incidents within Australia for 27 years - yet the SAME Australian Security officials responsible for administering the racist, draconian, human rights-abusing Anti- Terror Laws will NOT act against readily identifiable Australians complicit with the US Coalition in the post-2001 opioid drug deaths of 2,000 Australians - NOR will mainstream media identify them or EVEN ALLUDE to this unspeakable crime. Notes: [1]. See: http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/ legcon_ctte/terrorism/index.htm [2]. See: http://www.abc.net.au/rn/science/ockham/ stories/s1445960.htm [3]. See: http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/ legcon_ctte/terrorism/index.htm [4]. See: http://www.dfat.gov.au/aib/trade_investment.html [5]. See: http://world.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/22014/ Source: by courtesy & © 2005 Gideon Polya MMN Recommended Reading More readings... ¨ Help others before you need one regardless any natural or man-made calamity! ¨ ¨ Join the struggle to keep Media Monitors Network (MMN) on the web! ¨ Make a commitment to subscribe, donate and/or place all of your book and other product orders from Amazon.com and others through MMN Shopping web-site by clicking here. The percentage we get from these sales pays for maintaining and expanding MMN. News Write Your Neview What is Neview? Latest headlines Pharma's Poisoned Generation Two Earthquakes Hot Spots The Reality in "Paradise Now" Why Ted Koppel Shouldn't be Compared to Murrow More ... Today's feature The War On Truth: 9/11, Disinformation And The Anatomy Of Terrorism - by Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed More... Content needed on Africa Americas Asia-Pacific Europe Middle East South Asia USS Cole Iran Iraq Palestine Kashmir Chechnya Afghanistan Northern Ireland Immigration Reparations Any other topic About MMN | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions Copyright © 2005 MMN International Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. He Who Demands Your Rights Aims To Take Your Security To subscribe to VetZine email [EMAIL PROTECTED] VetZine blog http://vetzine.blogspot.com --------------------------------- Freedom America NOW E-List - News and Views >From New Babylon The beast is loose in Bethlehem and the rats are in the corn. Look up... for your redemption draweth nigh! ++++++Jesus Christ is the Answer, Check it out.++++++ http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20051125/wl_canada_nm/canada_irving_austria_col_1 Irving stays in jail on Holocaust charges VIENNA (Reuters) - British historian David Irving, known for his controversial views on World War Two, must stay in custody in Vienna while he is charged with denying the Holocaust, a court ruled on Friday. Vienna's state prosecutor this week charged Irving with denying the Holocaust in two lectures he gave in 1989. Denying the Holocaust is illegal under Austria's law prohibiting the Nazi Party. It carries a sentence of one to 10 years in prison. "His lawyer filed for his release from custody and offered bail," said a spokesman for the Vienna criminal court. "The judge dismissed his motion, ruling that there was a risk of escape and risk of committing the act (of denying the Holocaust)." Irving has three days to appeal against the ruling. The court will reconsider whether he has to stay in prison every month. The next scheduled court ruling is on December 27. Irving was arrested two weeks ago -- under a warrant issued in 1989 -- after visiting Vienna to speak at a meeting of a far-right student fraternity called Olympia, he told Austrian weekly magazine News. When driving to the meeting in Vienna, one of the students noticed plainclothes detectives waiting near the fraternity's house, he said. Irving changed plans and drove to Graz in the southern province of Styria to visit one of his publishers. Police stopped him on the motorway and detained him. Irving has two weeks to object to the charge. The court proceedings could start next year, the court spokesman said. A British High Court ruling in 2000 rejecting Irving's libel action against an American professor and her publishers who had declared Irving "an active Holocaust denier ... anti-Semitic and racist." _________________________________________________________ "We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force." ...Ayn Rand - The Nature of Government "When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." ...Frederic Bastiat "We're completely surrounded. That simplifies the problem." ...Lewis B. "Chesty" Puller, USMC "Lock And Load!" ...Southeast Asia - 1967 MOLON LABE! --------------------------------- Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
