Vic,
You accuse Paul of illogic, when your pro-nanny-government position is the least logical of them all (as I have previously demonstrated in detail). It's foolish to criticize for lack of perfectly clear logic, when there is only better and worse - and yours happens to be the worst. Maybe you should try denying the position again; in a way, it makes you look a little better. -Mark PS: Disagreement with seat-belt-like nanny laws does not an anarchist make. _____ Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The answer is no. The state does not have that power. Only the > parents have any decision making power over the safety of their children. right, so the kids rights are not inalienable. very odd indeed. of course this in no way conflicts with the idea that people are born with inalienable rights. and clearly black is white and white has always been black, and there is no conflict there what so ever. none zero zip. so peoples rights are inalienable except when they consent to waiving them except when they cant consent to waiving them or cant not consent to not waiving them or someone else decides they are not allowed to that consent or not except when then they dont or the people dont or dont not. all good consistent clean simple crystal clear logic. can someone tell me where the anarchy symbol on the keyboard is? Vic _____ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> AIDS in India: A "lurking bomb." Click and help stop AIDS now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/X6CDDD/lzNLAA/cUmLAA/KlSolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
