Public education is too important to leave to govt!  

-TLP


--- In [email protected], Marlon Machado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 16:34 -0600, justo wrote:
> 
> > That's just it. we don't.
> 
> 
> Fair enough. We don't.  But then, in my view, we'll loose our 
leadership
> in the world, kind of like what happened to Britain albeit for 
different
> reasons and under different circumstances. If future generations of
> Americans are cool with that, then there's nothing further to 
discuss.
> 
> I believe education is the only way we will maintain our leadership 
in
> the world. I believe innovation is our only hope to remain a 
superpower
> and innovation is more efficient when it comes from an educated
> populace.
> 
> 
> >    
> >  
> > It's very difficult for most folk to understand that Libertarians 
do not
> > view the role of Government as a Nanny Welfare function.  How did 
anyone
> > get educated before we had public education?
> 
> 
> Many people didn't and I'm sure lots of talent got lost. Our current
> rate of innovation is unprecedented and it's only because education
> became more universal in the last century. If public education is 
not
> the answer, then, we either accept the fact that "we don't", as you
> said, or we work on it.
> 
> 
> >  
> > In short, you pay for private education or hope that some private
> > charity offers it free of charge to the poor. the same applies 
with
> > health-care and all sorts of entitlement programs.
> 
> No argument there.
> 
> M
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>







ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to