Look what happen to the LP down in Costa Rica, that scared me and I
fear the same may happen with the Reform the LP movement here in the
US.
I joined the LP around Jan. 2000, I quickly was disheartned by the
party and did not renew my membership in 2001, today I rejoined the
party because of the increasing actvity of the Reformers.--- In
[email protected], "Terry L Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker" <txliberty@>
> wrote:
>
>
> 'Freedom' to violate you and yours
> is at the heart of LIMITED 'libertarianism'
>
> In an apparent attempt to usurp
> the continuing philosophic triumph
> of libertarianism, there is a push
> to re-define the word to accommodate
> political expediency. Now that the
> prevailing other 'isms' have essentially
> fallen, the banner of 'liberty' becomes
> a hijacking target. Aggressors eagerly
> want to use its appeal as camouflage
> for 'exceptions' they want to the
> UNIVERSALITY of actual consistent libertarianism.
>
> CONSISTENCY to society's 'physical aggression truce'
> (aka NAP 'non aggression principle' ZAP 'zero aggression
> principle' and so on) is not just an essential
> LIBERTARIAN principle, it is the foundation for
> liberty and justice for ALL!
>
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > An underlying principle in human action
> > is an innate `physical aggression truce'
> > which is also the underlying principle
> > for UNIVERSAL libertarianism.
> >
> > PleaseSee: What's at the Heart of What Libertarians are Selling?
> > at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/30419
> >
> >
> > This truce gives `self-ownership'
> > (exclusive right to determine use
> > and disposition) by each individual
> > person an essential material protection.
> > That can also be phrased as:
> > Reciprocal Physical Comprehensive Autonomy for each and every
> person.
> >
> > AlsoSee FlashAnimationAt-
> > http://www.isil.org/resources/introduction.html
> >
> >
> > Universal liberty's underlying 'physical aggression truce'
> > principle (aka NAP/ZAP and so on) thus accommodates
> > a just and broad array of choices by `self owning'
> > free moral agents, except for the INITIATION,
> > or credible threat of initiation, of physical force
> > against the person or justly held possessions
> > of another (note: the ban on these uses of physical force
> > does NOT apply to all other uses)
> >
> > see: Your Freedom & the Rights of Others
> > at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/22990
> >
> >
> > So, what would morally justify a person INITIATING,
> > or doing a credible threat to initiate, physical force
> > against the person or justly held possessions of another;
> > AND, why should this `truce' EXCEPTION be allowable
> > over the truce exceptions that may be wanted by someone else?
> >
> > Why would any truce violation be justified?
> >
> >
> > -Terry Liberty Parker
> > 'Real world' experiment in LIBERTARIAN community became famous
> > at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/message/2569
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Without consistency to a 'physical agression truce' the common
> > ground
> > > for 'liberty & justice for all' in the material world just
> > vanishes!
> > >
> > > While MOST people, MOST of the time, on MOST issues,
consciously
> or
> > > not, will abide by this 'truce' many seek 'exceptions' for
their
> > own
> > > causes. So, they will claim that such a 'commonality' doesn't
> > exist;
> > > and that those who say otherwise are being absurd. Of course,
> > > people, including these 'exceptors' would NOT be able to walk
out
> > > their door each day if there was no effective physical
aggression
> > > truce already working. But, that observation seems not to
> disuade
> > > these exceptors from attempting to con other people about the
> > > matter.
> > >
> > > The truth is, that it is CONSISTENCY to this 'physical
aggression
> > > truce' (aka NAP 'non aggression principle, ZAP 'zero aggression
> > > principle' and so on) which protects the 'self-ownership'
> autonomy
> > of
> > > virtually all persons. Most people DO seem to inherently
> > understand
> > > and usually apply the needed reciprocity; even if they don't
know
> > how
> > > to spell that word, let alone consciously define it. This, in
> > fact,
> > > is the underlying principle for UNIVERSAL libertarianism;
> > > aka 'liberty & justice for ALL'
> > >
> > > So, a question to would be 'exceptors' is: what makes you think
> you
> > > have the right to initiate, or do a credible threat to
initiate,
> > > physical force against the person or justly held possessions of
> > > another?
> > >
> > > PleaseSee: What's at the Heart of What Libertarians are Selling?
> > > at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/30419
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Imagine, if most can be persuaded to adhere to the
libertarian
> > > > principle of a physical aggression truce, while some
> (being 'more
> > > > equal than others') can make exceptions for their cause(s)...
> > > >
> > > > oops! That is NOT consistent to a universal libertarianism.
> > > >
> > > > see: Your Freedom and the Rights of Others
> > > > at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/22990
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker"
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The ONE common point of aggreement that is essential for
> MUTUAL
> > > > > benefit by individuals interacting, is a 'truce' on
> aggressing
> > > > > physically upon each other; aka universal libertarianism.
> > > > >
> > > > > see this about the Dandelion for graphic illustration of a
> > > singular
> > > > > point from which much can diverge (extrapolate?)
> > > > > at http://www.smm.org/sln/tf/d/dandelion/dandelion.html
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker"
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > CONSISTENT LIBERTARIANISM:
> > > > > > Reciprocal Physical Comprehensive Autonomy of Each Person
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thoughtful observation demonstrates
> > > > > > that the principle of a 'physical aggression truce'
> > > > > > between individuals as a means of all
> > > > > > MUTUALLY benefiting from interactions
> > > > > > is older, and more prevalent, than the human race;
> > > > > > it is inherent to social species!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > from Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary http://m-w.com/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Main Entry: con·sis·tent
> > > > > > Pronunciation: k&n-'sis-t&nt
> > > > > > Function: adjective
> > > > > > Etymology: Latin consistent-, consistens, present
> participle
> > of
> > > > > consistere
> > > > > > 1 archaic : possessing firmness or coherence
> > > > > > 2 a : marked by harmony, regularity, or steady
continuity :
> > > free
> > > > > from
> > > > > > variation or contradiction <a consistent style in
painting>
> > > > > > b : COMPATIBLE -- usually used with with
> > > > > > c : showing steady conformity to character, profession,
> > belief,
> > > > or
> > > > > custom <a
> > > > > > consistent patriot>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Main Entry: lib·er·tar·i·an
> > > > > > Pronunciation: "li-b&r-'ter-E-&n
> > > > > > Function: noun
> > > > > > 1 : an advocate of the doctrine of free will
> > > > > > 2 a : a person who upholds the principles of absolute and
> > > > > unrestricted
> > > > > > liberty especially of thought and action
> > > > > > b capitalized : a member of a political party advocating
> > > > libertarian
> > > > > > principles
> > > > > > - libertarian adjective
> > > > > > - lib·er·tar·i·an·ism /-E-&-"ni-z&m/ noun
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Main Entry: 1re·cip·ro·cal
> > > > > > Pronunciation: ri-'si-pr&-k&l
> > > > > > Function: adjective
> > > > > > Etymology: Latin reciprocus returning the same way,
> > alternating
> > > > > > 1 : inversely related : OPPOSITE
> > > > > > 2 : shared, felt, or shown by both sides
> > > > > > 3 : serving to reciprocate : consisting of or functioning
> as
> > a
> > > > > return in
> > > > > > kind <the reciprocal devastation of nuclear war>
> > > > > > 4 a : mutually corresponding <agreed to extend reciprocal
> > > > > privileges to each
> > > > > > other's citizens>
> > > > > > b : marked by or based on reciprocity <reciprocal trade
> > > > agreements>
> > > > > > - re·cip·ro·cal·ly /-k(&-)lE/ adverb
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Main Entry: 1phys·i·cal
> > > > > > Pronunciation: 'fi-zi-k&l
> > > > > > Function: adjective
> > > > > > Etymology: Middle English phisicale medical, from
Medieval
> > > Latin
> > > > > physicalis,
> > > > > > from Latin physica
> > > > > > 1 : having material existence : perceptible especially
> > through
> > > > the
> > > > > senses
> > > > > > and subject to the laws of nature <everything physical is
> > > > > measurable by
> > > > > > weight, motion, and resistance -- Thomas De Quincey> b :
of
> > or
> > > > > relating to
> > > > > > material things
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Main Entry: com·pre·hen·sive
> > > > > > Pronunciation: -'hen(t)-siv
> > > > > > Function: adjective
> > > > > > 1 : covering completely or broadly : INCLUSIVE
> <comprehensive
> > > > > examinations>
> > > > > > <comprehensive insurance>
> > > > > > 2 : having or exhibiting wide mental grasp <comprehensive
> > > > knowledge>
> > > > > > - com·pre·hen·sive·ly adverb
> > > > > > - com·pre·hen·sive·ness noun
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Main Entry: au·ton·o·my
> > > > > > Pronunciation: -mE
> > > > > > Function: noun
> > > > > > Inflected Form(s): plural -mies
> > > > > > 1 : the quality or state of being self-governing;
> > especially :
> > > > the
> > > > > right of
> > > > > > self-government
> > > > > > 2 : self-directing freedom and especially moral
independence
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Main Entry: each
> > > > > > Pronunciation: 'Ech
> > > > > > Function: adjective
> > > > > > Etymology: Middle English ech, from Old English [AE]lc;
> akin
> > to
> > > > Old
> > > > > High
> > > > > > German iogilIh each; both from a prehistoric West
Germanic
> > > > compound
> > > > > whose
> > > > > > first and second constituents respectively are
represented
> by
> > > Old
> > > > > English A
> > > > > > always and by Old English gelIc alike
> > > > > > : being one of two or more distinct individuals having a
> > > similar
> > > > > relation
> > > > > > and often constituting an aggregate
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Main Entry: per·son
> > > > > > Pronunciation: 'p&r-s&n
> > > > > > Function: noun
> > > > > > Etymology: Middle English, from Old French persone, from
> > Latin
> > > > > persona
> > > > > > actor's mask, character in a play, person, probably from
> > > Etruscan
> > > > > phersu
> > > > > > mask, from Greek prosOpa, plural of prosOpon face, mask --
> > more
> > > at
> > > > > > PROSOPOPOEIA
> > > > > > 1 : HUMAN, INDIVIDUAL -- sometimes used in combination
> > > especially
> > > > > by those
> > > > > > who prefer to avoid man in compounds applicable to both
> sexes
> > > > > <chairperson>
> > > > > > <spokesperson>
> > > > > > 2 : a character or part in or as if in a play : GUISE
> > > > > > 3 a : one of the three modes of being in the Trinitarian
> > > Godhead
> > > > as
> > > > > > understood by Christians b : the unitary personality of
> > Christ
> > > > that
> > > > > unites
> > > > > > the divine and human natures
> > > > > > 4 a archaic : bodily appearance b : the body of a human
> > being;
> > > > > also : the
> > > > > > body and clothing <unlawful search of the person>
> > > > > > 5 : the personality of a human being : SELF
> > > > > > 6 : one (as a human being, a partnership, or a
corporation)
> > > that
> > > > is
> > > > > > recognized by law as the subject of rights and duties
> > > > > > 7 : reference of a segment of discourse to the speaker,
to
> > one
> > > > > spoken to, or
> > > > > > to one spoken of as indicated by means of certain
pronouns
> or
> > > in
> > > > > many
> > > > > > languages by verb inflection
> > > > > > - per·son·hood /-"hud/ noun
> > > > > > - in person : in one's bodily presence
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can you comprehend, embrace, be consistent to, and
promote
> > this?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 'Reciprocal physical comprehensive autonomy for each
person'
> > > > > > refers to a society in which each person is sovereign
> > > > > > (aka individual sovereignty) over a physical domain
> > > > > > that consists of their body and honestly acquired
> possessions;
> > > > > > and a 'truce' on physical aggression by one person
against
> > > > another.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That does not necessarily describe an atomistic society
> with
> > no
> > > > > > interactions between these 'sovereign domains' It just
> means
> > > that
> > > > > > any physical interaction must be CONSENSUAL rather than
the
> > only
> > > > > > alternative option, COERCIVE. Libertarians advocate
> > > a 'consensual
> > > > > > society' over the 'coercive society' of authoritarians.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Libertarianism's 'physical aggression truce' premise (aka
> > > > > > NAP 'non-aggression principle' & ZAP 'zero aggression
> > > principle')
> > > > > > thus accommodates a just and broad array of choices by
> > > > > > free moral agents EXCEPT for the INITIATION, or credible
> > threat
> > > > > > of initiation, of physical force against the person
> > > > > > or justly acquired possessions of another.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > also see 'Your Freedom and the Rights of Others'
> > > > > > at
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/22990>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Libertarians are NOT 'know it alls' so it's now up to
some
> of
> > > you
> > > > > > folks in the audience to tell me and others, how would
> > > consistency
> > > > > > to this principle improve that part of the world in which
> YOU
> > > are
> > > > > > the expert?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Terry Liberty Parker
> > > > > > Libertarian InterNet `meet up' a `Winner'
> > > > > > at
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/27519>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 'Real World' famous LIBERTARIAN community experiment
> > > > > > at
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/message/2569>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
>
> --- End forwarded message ---
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
