Try to imagine making a good point by calling this person this
name after they have said something like "my main job is to
protect the American people" or "but we must protect the
children". I'm not sure calling him a fascist would fit or expose
the trick clearly enough to others who hear you. I like "warden"
better, but it still misses the bulls-eye.
************
{In a criminal trial, no American juror is legally bound to vote
"guilty" if he/she has reasonable doubt over the
constitutionality or fairness of the charge, no matter the
evidence of guilt. Nor is the juror bound to arrive at a
unanimous verdict to avoid a mistrial. Get on a jury, stand your
ground, and help fulfill one of its original purposes: to
counteract abusive government. See www.fija.org.}
_____
I'm not sure why "fascist" shouldn't be the right word, though
perhaps it comes on too strong in polite conversation. A fascist
suggests that you have nominal control of your life, as long as
you do what the government says you can do.
How about "warden"?
_____
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
