China is not the US, they don't have a multi party system, and so China isn't realy relative to what I am talking about, I got side tracked by Paul's evil stupifying vudoo...
This is the question you have then, compromise and make greater progress, or refuse compromise and not reach your full potential of progress. --- In [email protected], "mark robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A group based on political/philosophical principles would not be > wise to include compromise as one of them - it would defeat the > purpose of the principles. Individual candidates may decide to > compromise, but the position/principle/philosophy of the party > would be foolish to promote such. Historically, progressive > compromises (AFAIK) have usually been brought about by pressures > from libertarian-like political philosophies; not the other way > around. In other words, recent Chinese progression is likely an > effect of the promotion of libertarian-like principles; NOT from > the promotion of compromise. > > > > > > ************ > {In a criminal trial, no American juror is legally bound to vote > "guilty" if he/she has reasonable doubt over the > constitutionality or fairness of the charge, no matter the > evidence of guilt. Nor is the juror bound to arrive at a > unanimous verdict to avoid a mistrial. Get on a jury, stand your > ground, and help fulfill one of its original purposes: to > counteract abusive government. See www.fija.org.} > > > > _____ > > > > Urmas's posts reminded me of something Paul, were are not > talking > about food and poisen, or communists, or catholics and > protestants. > We are talking politics. > > If you want to tell me compromise never works in politics, then > explain to me why the more moderate candidate has almost always > won > the presidential election in US history. I think maybee, it would > be > better that I tell you rather than ask you to tell me as you > might > not bother to ponder the question before you answer, as you have > claiemd to do before, and spit out a slew of uninteligable rubish > > that will again side track me from my point... > > The reason is that compromise works, and only compromise works. > > > > > _____ > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
