Perhaps Pawn or Pion would be more quickley understood than Subject.. so no one likes "Dick Lackies?"
--- In [email protected], "gclark809" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Those who will give up their rights for protection are none but > subjects of the state. > > > --- In [email protected], "mark robert" <colowe@> wrote: > > > > Why "subject"? > > > > > > > > > > > > ************ > > {In a criminal trial, no American juror is legally bound to vote > > "guilty" if he/she has reasonable doubt over the > > constitutionality or fairness of the charge, no matter the > > evidence of guilt. Nor is the juror bound to arrive at a > > unanimous verdict to avoid a mistrial. Get on a jury, stand your > > ground, and help fulfill one of its original purposes: to > > counteract abusive government. See www.fija.org.} > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > I would submit "subject." > > > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
