When did I say there was Terry. I never even typed the words "prior 
restraint" in the confines of this forumn. I do get a warm fuzzy 
feeling all over knowing that you read enuff of my posts to respond 
to them though, like I just had a 'big cup of cocoa' mmm.

It would be rather dificult to impose prior restraint on speech, 
what would one do to restrain speech prior to its action, put jaw 
locks on every one and require all speech be submited in writting 
before authorization for release of said jaw lock.

The only restraint on free speech is knowing your accountable for 
everything you say, and some do not even understand a thing as 
simple as that, leaving them utterly unrestrained. Wether I agree or 
not with what they say, I can say I am glad to be an American 
because of it.

--- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> UncoolRabbit, there is NO 'prior restraint' of one's exercise 
> of 'free speech' allowed by the USA Constitution!  
> 
> American IDEAL theory is for one to exercise one's freedom 
> AND deal with consequences; good or bad.  
> 
> -Terry Liberty Parker 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "uncoolrabbit" <uncoolrabbit@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > Freedom of association is great and all, but like all things how 
> > does it apply to reality. Slander and liabl are not protected by 
> > free speach, just as descrimination is not protected by freedom 
of 
> > association.
> > 
> > Now, if your a public resteraunt, you have chosen to associate 
with 
> > the public. If your a private club, you have chosen to associate 
> > with your members. 
> > 
> > In my opinion, liberty applys to all races. however in the 
opinion 
> > of many people here, I am not a Libertarian. So the decision is 
up 
> > to you, what do you think a Libertarian society would offer 
> > minorities.
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "zmaitreya11" <zmaitreya11@> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], Cory Nott <corynott@> 
wrote:
> > > >    
> > > >    
> > > >    
> > > >   If a small town restaurant doesn't want to serve African-
> > > Americans, is it worth the cost of forcing them to do so? 
> > > 
> > > >    
> > > >   Also, I wonder how strongly do you believe in the First 
> > > Amendment. I suppose free speech is important to you, right? 
> Well, 
> > > what about the freedom of association? Is that not as 
important, 
> > or 
> > > are some rights less inherent or more rightfully trampled by 
> > > government intervention? A person should be free to associate, 
in 
> > > his or her property or business, with whomever he or she 
pleases. 
> > > Some people will choose not to associate with members of 
another 
> > > race. I choose not to associate with racists.
> > > >    
> > > >    Cory
> > > >    
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Okay, some interesting points by Cory and others.  Maybe I 
should 
> > > have used a better example, not that I am convinced yet over 
the 
> > > restaurant example.  People do have a right to associate with 
who 
> > > they want and also the right not to associate.
> > > 
> > > But eating out and enjoying the use of various businesses is 
also 
> > a 
> > > right and a freedom.  It is denied in the case of a racist 
> > business 
> > > owner.  How about the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit 
of 
> > > happiness?  Happiness could be defined by the right and 
ability 
> to 
> > > use various businesses.
> > > 
> > > Now let's take a more important example, work.  In a 
Libertarian 
> > > world could a business owner discriminate against minorities 
for 
> > > hiring?  I am not talking about quotas or affirmative action, 
> just 
> > > getting a job if you are the most qualified and also a 
minority.  
> > > What if again, like the restaurant example, the business owner 
> did 
> > > not want to hire the minority and stood to make more money by 
not 
> > > hiring him and not losing his regular racist customers?
> > > 
> > > Are minorities just out of luck in a Libertarian world?  I see 
at 
> > > this time from the other posts, that one Libertarian 
politician 
> > has 
> > > just left the party over the racism issues.
> > > 
> > > Libertarians appear to be focused on liberties and freedom, 
but 
> > how 
> > > about the freedom to go into any business, the freedom to get 
a 
> > job 
> > > when you are the most qualified, the freedom to earn a living, 
> the 
> > > freedom to pursue happiness?  
> > > 
> > > Or does that just apply to members of the majority race?
> > > 
> > > David
> > >
> >
>






ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to