? 
 
  a.. About Us
    a.. Mission 
    b.. Ludwig Who? 
    c.. Murray Who? 
    d.. Faculty/Staff 
    e.. FAQ 
    f.. Campus Tour 
    g.. Email Service 
    h.. Ads & posters 
    i.. Submissions 
    j.. Donate Now! 
    k.. Contact 
  b.. Daily Articles
    a.. Full list 
    b.. The Blog 
    c.. Title 
    d.. Date 
    e.. Authors 
    f.. Free Subscription 
  c.. Media
    a.. Media Archive 
    b.. Mises Radio 
    c.. Live Webcasts 
    d.. RSS and Podcasting 
  d.. Publications
    a.. The Blog 
    b.. Free Market 
    c.. Mises Review 
    d.. The QJAE 
    e.. The JLS 
    f.. Libertarian Forum 
    g.. Working Papers 
    h.. E-texts 
    i.. More Pubs 
    j.. Mises.org Site Search 
  e.. Events
    a.. Austrian Sch. Conf. 
    b.. Mises U 
    c.. DiLorenzo Sem. 
    d.. RL Long Sem. 
    e.. Cantor Sem. 
    f.. Mises Campus 
    g.. Fellowships 
    h.. Travel 
    i.. Dates in History 
  f.. Resources
    a.. Study Guide 
    b.. Human Action 
    c.. Man, Econ, & State 
    d.. E-books 
    e.. The Core 
    f.. Mises's Books 
    g.. All authors 
    h.. Classroom 
    i.. In-House Library 
    j.. The Forum 
    k.. Marketwatch 
    l.. Film List 
    m.. Mises.org Site Search 
  g.. Store
    a.. Gear 
    b.. Books 
    c.. Subscriptions 
    d.. Memorabilia 
    e.. Mises Collection 
    f.. Bastiat Collection 
    g.. Home study 
    h.. What's New 
    i.. My Basket 
  h.. Students
    a.. Live Chat 
    b.. The Network 
    c.. Classroom 
    d.. What is Austro-econ? 
    e.. The Quiz 
    f.. Fellowships 
    g.. Conf. Scholarships 
    h.. Syllabi 
    i.. Fun 
    j.. Awards 
    k.. Forum 
 
Tuesday, February 21, 2006 
 
            Stateless in Somalia, and Loving It 


            by Yumi Kim 

            [Posted on Tuesday, February 21, 2006] 
            [Subscribe at email services and tell others] 


            Somalia is in the news again. Rival gangs are shooting each other, 
and why? The reason is always the same: the prospect that the weak-to-invisible 
transitional government in Mogadishu will become a real government with actual 
power.

            The media invariably describe this prospect as a "hope." But it's a 
strange hope that is accompanied by violence and dread throughout the country. 
Somalia has done very well for itself in the 15 years since its government was 
eliminated. The future of peace and prosperity there depends in part on keeping 
one from forming.

            As even the CIA factbook admits:

              "Despite the seeming anarchy, Somalia's service sector has 
managed to survive and grow. Telecommunication firms provide wireless services 
in most major cities and offer the lowest international call rates on the 
continent. In the absence of a formal banking sector, money exchange services 
have sprouted throughout the country, handling between $500 million and $1 
billion in remittances annually. Mogadishu's main market offers a variety of 
goods from food to the newest electronic gadgets. Hotels continue to operate, 
and militias provide security."

            To understand more about the country without a government, turn to 
The Law of the Somalis, written by Michael van Notten (1933-2002) and edited by 
Spencer Heath MacCallum, sheds light on the little known Somali law, culture 
and economic situation. Somalia is often cited as an example of a stateless 
society where chaos is the "rule" and warlords are aplenty.

            The BBC's country profile of Somalia sums up this view as widely 
publicized by the mainstream media: "Somalia has been without an effective 
central government since President Siad Barre was overthrown in 1991. Fighting 
between rival warlords and an inability to deal with famine and disease led to 
the deaths of up to one million people."

            The first sentence is indeed true: when the president was driven 
out by opposing clans in 1991, the government disintegrated. The second 
sentence, however, depicts Somalia as a lawless country in disorder. As for 
disorder, Van Notten quotes authorities to the effect that Somalia's 
telecommunications are the best in Africa, its herding economy is stronger than 
that of either of its neighbors, Kenya or Ethiopia, and that since the demise 
of the central government, the Somali shilling has become far more stable in 
world currency markets, while exports have quintupled.

            As for Somalia being lawless, Van Notten, a Dutch lawyer who 
married into the Samaron Clan and lived the last dozen years of his life with 
them, specifically challenges that portrayal. He explains that Somalia is a 
country based on customary law. The traditional Somali system of law and 
politics, he contends, is capable of maintaining a peaceful society and guiding 
the Somalis to prosperity. Moreover, efforts to re-establish a central 
government or impose democracy on the people are incompatible with the 
customary law.

            Van Notten distinguishes between the four meanings of the word 
"law" - statutory, contractual, customary, and natural law. The common 
misunderstanding is that legitimate rules only come from formally established 
entities and that therefore a country without a legislature is lawless. 
Refuting that misunderstanding, van Notten explains that a perfectly orderly 
and peaceful country can exist when people respect property rights and honor 
their contracts. While natural laws denote peace, liberty, and friendly 
relations, statutory laws represent commands. Statutory laws reflect the 
preferences of legislators, who impose "morality" on those they govern and 
regulate their ability to voluntarily enter into contracts. This, according to 
van Notten, is wrong from the standpoint of both morality and law.

            Customary laws develop in a country like Somalia in the absence of 
a central legislating body. Rules "emerge spontaneously as people go about 
their daily business and try to solve the problems that occasionally arise in 
it without upsetting the patterns of cooperation on which they so heavily 
depend" (Van Notten, 15: 2005). Van Notten contends that the Somali customary 
law closely follows the natural law and therefore should be preserved.

            The extended family is the core of Somali society. Families 
descended from common great grandparent form a jilib, the basic independent 
jural unit, and a number of jilibs in turn form a clan. Each family, jilib, and 
clan has its own judge, whose role is to facilitate the handling of disputes by 
deciding where the liability lies and what compensation should be paid. For 
example if a man is murdered, the murderer's clan gives the victim's clan one 
hundred camels (the blood price). Verdicts are widely discussed, and a judge 
who does not base his decision on norms prevailing in the community is unlikely 
to be asked to settle further disputes. Thus while a judge may form his own 
principles, his customers will decide his competence as a judge.

            The family of the successful plaintiff can resort to self-help to 
enforce a payment, or the court can order the men of the community to do so. 
Every clansman is insured by his jilib. For instance, if A violates B's right 
and it is held that A should pay compensation to B, A's jilib will provide the 
compensation. Hence the jilib functions as "a safety net, venture capital, 
protection, and insurance" (Van Notten, 74: 2005).

            If a clan member constantly violates others' rights and his jilib 
repeatedly pays compensation, the jilib can expel him. On the other hand, there 
is nothing to stop someone from leaving his jilib and joining another, if it 
will have him, or setting up his own. A person without a jilib is unthinkable, 
an outlaw, because he is not insured against liabilities he might incur toward 
others. Hence he loses all protection of the law.

            Decisions are enforced and oaths taken in ways that may seem 
unsophisticated or odd, yet they are the custom and must be respected. If, for 
instance, the defendant refuses to comply with the verdict without appealing 
his case to a higher court, he can be tied to a tree covered with black ants 
until he agrees. When evidence is sketchy or lacking, several types of oaths 
are available. A strong oath is one that is repeated fifty times. Another type 
is a divorce oath. If a man testifies under divorce oath and it is later found 
that his testimony was false, his marriage becomes null and void.

            Independent extended families being the basic social and economic 
unit does have its weaknesses. While clansmen are under no obligation to share 
their wealth with other clans, they must share it to a significant extent 
within the clan. Van Notten notes this as a drawback and states that the "law 
makes clansmen somewhat a prisoner of their clan." Since individuals differ in 
their productivity, it is inevitable that some family members will benefit from 
more successful members. In addition, as a way of promoting internal cohesion, 
extended families may foment animosity against other families. Van Notten also 
writes that foreigners are not recognized under Somali law unless they marry 
into a clan or come under the protection of a Somali patron.

            This has important economic implications. For example, because land 
cannot be sold outside the clan, foreigners would generally be prohibited from 
purchasing it. One way to work with this might be land leasing, which is 
possible under customary law. Somali elders suggested to Van Notten that a 
group of foreign investors could form their own 'clan' on a leased territory 
and develop it, say for a free port, on a land-lease basis.

            An important discussion centers around democracy. In 1960, when the 
British and Italian colonizers withdrew from Somalia, they formed the 
government of the Republic of Somalia as a democratic entity. Nine years later, 
the country was under a dictatorship. Through these events, according to van 
Notten, many Somalis realized that they could return to their traditional form 
of governance founded on independent clans.

            Nevertheless, since 1991, the United Nations has made efforts to 
promote the establishment of a democratic government in Somalia. Van Notten 
strongly argues that such government is incompatible with the Somali customary 
law, which prizes life, liberty, and property. He asserts that democracy is not 
even a viable option:

              "When the electorate is composed of close-knit tribal, religious, 
linguistic or ethnic communities, the people invariably vote, not on the merits 
of any issue, but for the party of their own community. The community with the 
greatest numbers wins the election, and the minority parties then put rebellion 
and secession at the top of their political agenda. That is nothing but a 
recipe for chaos." (van Notten, 127; 2005)

            Van Notten contends that the argument that a central government is 
a prerequisite for making treaties with foreign government agencies is flawed 
because the Somalis have long dealt with foreign governments and their agencies 
on a clan-by-clan basis. A common ministry of foreign affairs would pose a 
grave danger because it would undermine the customary law. He suggests that 
clans sharing a common interest could appoint a private company as their common 
agent. Van Notten and MacCallum further dispute that a central government is 
needed to provide "public" services. They propose the establishment of 
freeports, land-leasing, and commercial insurance companies. Certain sectors 
such as telecommunications have been thriving in Somalia's free market and 
government regulation could only hinder their growth.

            Questions arise as to rampageous warlords when discussing a country 
without a central government. Van Notten explains that warlords exist because 
of the efforts to form a central government, not because of its absence:

              "A democratic government has every power to exert dominion over 
people. To fend off the possibility of being dominated, each clan tries to 
capture the power of that government before it can become a threat. Those clans 
that didn't share in the spoils of political power would realize their chances 
of becoming part of the ruling alliance were nil. Therefore, they would rebel 
and try to secede. That would prompt the ruling clans to use every means to 
suppress these centrifugal forces. in the end all clans would fight with one 
another." (van Notten, 136; 2005)

            He thus asserts that efforts by the United Nations are not only 
futile, but also harmful to the Somalis.

            Van Notten calls for documentation of clan law systems to 
facilitate doing business with foreigners, especially, on a nationwide scale. 
He argues that by compiling all the major jurisprudence under Somali law, the 
customary law will more readily evolve into a coherent body of common law. But 
if each clan is only bound by its own rules and custom, and if the Somalis so 
far never felt the need for the "merger of clan law systems," why would 
compiling rules of all different clans be necessary? Moreover, it is unclear 
how such a task can effectively be undertaken when the customary law evolves 
constantly, and clans have a nomadic character.

            The book does not contain information regarding the Somali 
presidential election in 2004, which took place in Kenya. Efforts to construct 
a formal government continue but they appear to be in vain, inspiring hope in 
UN bureaucrats and the news media, but only fear and loathing in Mogadishu and 
the rest of the country.


--------------------------------------------------------------------

            Yumi Kim studied law in London, where she now works in financial 
services. Send her mail. Comment on the blog.


            You can receive the Mises Daily Article in your inbox. Go here to 
subscribe or unsubscribe.
           
     Ludwig von Mises: "The positivists tell us that one day a new scientific 
discipline will emerge which will make good their promises and will describe in 
every detail the physical and chemical processes that produce in the body of 
man definite ideas. But it is evident that such a metaphysical proposition can 
in no way invalidate the results of the discursive reasoning of the sciences of 
human action." - Theory and History 
            Favorites  
              a.. Mises Blog 
              b.. Email Lists 
              c.. Live Chat 
              d.. FAQ 
              e.. Membership 
              f.. Mises Store 
              g.. Marketwatch 
              h.. LewRockwell.com 
              i.. Calendar 
            STUDENTS

              a.. Quiz 
              b.. House Library 
              c.. Working Papers 
              d.. Study Guide 
              e.. Austrian Forum 
              f.. Mises Classroom 
              g.. Fellowships 
              h.. Awards 
            LITERATURE

              a.. Human Action 
              b.. Man, Economy, and State, 
              c.. Mises 
              d.. Rothbard 
              e.. All authors 
              f.. All Subjects 
            JOURNALS

              a.. QJAE 
              b.. JLS 
              c.. Mises Review 
              d.. Free Market 
              e.. AEN 
              f.. Left & Right 
              g.. Lib. Forum 
              h.. RAE 
            MORE AIDS

              a.. RSS Feeds  
              b.. Films on Liberty 
              c.. Faculty and Staff 
              d.. Austrian Network 
              e.. Contact 
           
     
      Print This Page

     ^ Top of Page 
      SEND TO:


      FROM:  
      (Enter the email address)

       
      (Enter your email address)
         Ludwig von Mises Institute
      518 West Magnolia Avenue
      Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528
      334.321.2100 · Phone
      334.321.2119 · Fax
      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
      AOL-IM MainMises

       
     
      Home
      About
      FAQ
      Email Lists
      Blog
      Periodicals
      Coming Events
      Articles  Study Guide
      Working Papers
      Mises
      Rothbard
      Catalog
      Shopping Basket
      Donate
      Audio

     

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to