Boyd, do you regard as appropriate 911 responce, the USA mass destruction of INNOCENT life, limb and property in Afghanistan?
-Terry Liberty Parker http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian --- In [email protected], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: phantomofroute66 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I'm relatively new to the group and haven't posted much, so pardon > > me if I'm just repeating things for the millionth time. > > > > To me, it seems that the NAP is very simple. The only way to > > adhere to it is to let someone attack you if they are determined to do so, > > then make them (and ONLY them) pay for that mistake. If we stopped > > playing policeman of the world, followed this principle and then > > made sure there was hell to pay in the fullest for anyone who in fact > > did attack us, what would we have to fear from anyone? > > > > To anyone using bin Laden and Al Queda as an example, > > Laden planned, financed and directed the attacks. He has made and continues to make credible threats of force and the use of others to direct force against innocent people. He is a force initiator and can be legitimately killed by any follower of the ZAP/NAP/RPAT for what he has done. As well as anyone who helped him do what he has done. > > BWS > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
