And of course, as Paul already mentioned, it wasn't Clinton's 
embargo.

--- In [email protected], "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Wrong as usual.  Saying "All Saddam ever had to do was agree to 
peace"
> is like saying, "All the woman had to do was agree to let us rape 
her,
> and she wouldn't have been injured during our rape.
> 
> Iraq was under NO OBLIGATION TO DISARM, and America had NO 
AUTHORITY
> to force them to do so.
> 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Geof Gibson" <geofgibson@> 
wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "David Macko" <dmacko@> 
wrote:
> > >
> > > Clinton's embargo is said to have caused the deaths of
> > > half a million Iraqis, including many innocent women and
> > > children.
> > > 
> > 
> > So, the deaths are Clinton's fault?  All Saddam ever had to do 
was
> > agree to peace (something many seem to revere above all else), 
and
> > there would have been no deaths.
> >
>






ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to