Brasil is to reach Oil Independance by next year using a combination 
of bio fuels and local potroleum production. This industry is also 
profitable in Brasil, important to note to any would be nay sayers. 
Canada's bio fuel industry is also growing rapidly. Why isn't the 
US's? 

There wont be any serious investment or supportive legislature for 
the US bio fuels industry until oil's profitability dies do to lack 
of supply, a real lack of supply that can't be rectified by turning 
up the flow out of the wells or building new refineries.

Why aren't troops gaurding every pipeline in Iraq, making sure 
production is up, so Iraqi oil could pay Haliburton's no bid 
contract fees? Because it would drop oil prices, its more profitable 
for big oil for the american tax payer to foot the bill in Iraq than 
Iraq itself. I said along time ago that the war with Iraq was a 
combination of blood fued between the Bush family and Sadam, and 
disrupting stability in the gulf. However, I don't write for the 
Gaurdian so few hear me and those that do rarley listen to what they 
hear from me. Especialy when reading... as my spelling does not lend 
well to my credibility :)

--- In [email protected], "David Macko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here is an interesting scenario and a quite plausible
> explanation for the Iraq War.
> 
> For life and liberty,
> David Macko
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Greg Palast" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 2:04 PM
> Subject: Bush Didn't Bungle Iraq, You Fools
> 
> 
> > Bush Didn't Bungle Iraq, You Fools
> > THE MISSION WAS INDEED ACCCOMPLISHED
> > by Greg Palast
> > for The Guardian
> >
> > 20 March 2006
> >
> > Get off it. All the carping, belly-aching and complaining about 
George 
> > Bush's incompetence in Iraq, from both the Left and now the 
Right, is just 
> > dead wrong.
> >
> > On the third anniversary of the tanks rolling over Iraq's 
border, most of 
> > the 59 million Homer Simpsons who voted for Bush are beginning 
to doubt if 
> > his mission was accomplished.
> >
> > But don't kid yourself -- Bush and his co-conspirator, Dick 
Cheney, 
> > accomplished exactly what they set out to do. In case you've 
forgotten 
> > what their real mission was, let me remind you of White House 
spokesman 
> > Ari Fleisher's original announcement, three years ago, launching 
of what 
> > he called,
> >
> >         "Operation
> >          Iraqi
> >          Liberation."
> >
> > O.I.L. How droll of them, how cute. Then, Karl Rove made the 
giggling boys 
> > in the White House change it to "OIF" -- Operation Iraqi 
Freedom. But the 
> > 101st Airborne wasn't sent to Basra to get its hands on Iraq's 
OIF.
> >
> > "It's about oil," Robert Ebel told me. Who is Ebel? Formerly the 
CIA's top 
> > oil analyst, he was sent by the Pentagon, about a month before 
the 
> > invasion, to a secret confab in London with Saddam's former oil 
minister 
> > to finalize the plans for "liberating" Iraq's oil industry. In 
London, 
> > Bush's emissary Ebel also instructed Ibrahim Bahr al-Ulum, the 
man the 
> > Pentagon would choose as post-OIF oil minister for Iraq, on the 
correct 
> > method of disposing Iraq's crude.
> >
> > And what did the USA want Iraq to do with Iraq's oil? The answer 
will 
> > surprise many of you: and it is uglier, more twisted, devilish 
and devious 
> > than anything imagined by the most conspiracy-addicted blogger. 
The answer 
> > can be found in a 323-page plan for Iraq's oil secretly drafted 
by the 
> > State Department. Our team got a hold of a copy; how, doesn't 
matter. The 
> > key thing is what's inside this thick Bush diktat: a directive 
to Iraqis 
> > to maintain a state oil company that will "enhance its 
relationship with 
> > OPEC."
> >
> > Enhance its relationship with OPEC??? How strange: the 
government of the 
> > United States ordering Iraq to support the very OPEC oil cartel 
which is 
> > strangling our nation with outrageously high prices for crude.
> >
> > Specifically, the system ordered up by the Bush cabal would keep 
a lid on 
> > Iraq's oil production -- limiting Iraq's oil pumping to the 
tight quota 
> > set by Saudi Arabia and the OPEC cartel.
> >
> > There you have it. Yes, Bush went in for the oil -- not to get 
MORE of 
> > Iraq's oil, but to prevent Iraq producing TOO MUCH of it.
> >
> > You must keep in mind who paid for George's ranch and Dick's 
bunker: Big 
> > Oil. And Big Oil -- and their buck-buddies, the Saudis -- don't 
make money 
> > from pumping more oil, but from pumping LESS of it. The lower 
the supply, 
> > the higher the price.
> >
> > It's Economics 101. The oil industry is run by a cartel, OPEC, 
and what 
> > economists call an "oligopoly" -- a tiny handful of operators 
who make 
> > more money when there's less oil, not more of it. So, every time 
the 
> > "insurgents" blow up a pipeline in Basra, every time Mad Mahmoud 
in Tehran 
> > threatens to cut supply, the price of oil leaps. And Dick and 
George just 
> > LOVE it.
> >
> > Dick and George didn't want more oil from Iraq, they wanted 
less. I know 
> > some of you, no matter what I write, insist that our President 
and his 
> > Veep are on the hunt for more crude so you can cheaply fill your 
family 
> > Hummer; that somehow, these two oil-patch babies are concerned 
that the 
> > price of gas in the USA is bumping up to $3 a gallon.
> >
> > No so, gentle souls. Three bucks a gallon in the States (and a 
quid a 
> > litre in Britain) means colossal profits for Big Oil, and that 
makes 
> > Dick's ticker go pitty-pat with joy. The top oily-gopolists, the 
five 
> > largest oil companies, pulled in $113 billion in profit in 2005 -
-  
> > compared to a piddly $34 billion in 2002 before Operation Iraqi 
> > Liberation. In other words, it's been a good war for Big Oil.
> >
> > As per Plan Bush, Bahr Al-Ulum became Iraq's occupation oil 
minister; the 
> > conquered nation "enhanced its relationship with OPEC;" and the 
price of 
> > oil, from Clinton peace-time to Bush war-time, shot up 317%.
> >
> > In other words, on the third anniversary of invasion, we can say 
the 
> > attack and occupation is, indeed, a Mission Accomplished. 
However, it 
> > wasn't America's mission, nor the Iraqis'. It was an Mission 
Accomplished 
> > for OPEC and Big Oil.
> >
> > **********
> > On June 6, Penguin Dutton will release GREG PALAST'S NEW 
BOOK, "ARMED 
> > MADHOUSE:  DISPATCHES FROM THE FRONT LINES OF THE CLASS WAR."  
Order it 
> > today -- and view his investigative reports for Harper's 
Magazine and BBC 
> > television's Newsnight -- at www.GregPalast.com.
> >
> > Palast returns to the pages of the Guardian today with this 
column. Catch 
> > his commentaries weekly.
> > **********
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ============================================
> > If you would like to have your e-mail address removed from this 
mailing 
> > list. Cut and paste the following URL into your browser address 
bar. This 
> > will automatically remove from the mailing list and you will 
receive no 
> > further mailings.
> > http://www.gregpalast.com/emailremove.cfm?id=55887
> >
> >
>







ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to