Jim, over what would you want to INITIATE, or do a credible 
threat to initiate, physical force upon an innocent person 
or their justly held possession?  

-Terry Liberty Parker 
please see what I wrote in 
What 'Justifies' IINITIATING Physical Force? 
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/30715  


--- In [email protected], Jim Syler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is precisely about libertarianism pro or con, in particular 
con to 
> the narrow, rigid, "NAP" definition of libertarianism, and how 
stumped 
> people who hold this view are when you ask them certain questions.
> 
> On Mar 27, 2006, at 7:19 PM, Terry L Parker wrote:
> 
> > Jim, if you're looking for an answer to the question of what
> > label to put on someone you're in the wrong forum.
> >
> > If you want to explore ideas, actions, issues, positions and
> > so on regarding LIBERTARIANISM pro and/or con, this forum is
> > an appropriate one.
> >
> >
> > -Terry Liberty Parker
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
> >
> >
> > --- In [email protected], Jim Syler <Calion@> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mar 27, 2006, at 3:31 PM, steven linnabary wrote:
> >>
> >>>> If you want to restrict libertarianism to just the purists, 
than
> > what
> >>>> label do you give to advocacies of partial libertarianism;
> >>>> basically inconsistent fiscally conservative yet socially
> > tolerant?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Not at all, Eric.  ANYBODY can proclaim themselves libertarian.
> >>>
> >>> But LEADERSHIP positions, including (especially) major 
candidates
> > MUST
> >>> be
> >>> purist.  Otherwise, an ideological party will just become 
another
> >>> "common
> >>> carrier" party such as the democrats and republicans.
> >>>
> >>>> They hate this question.  Puts them in a corner.  Forces them 
to
> >>>> admit that deep down they are advocating exclusivity.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Leadership, by definition, is exclusive.
> >>
> >> I notice you haven't answered the question.
> >>
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> "I used to think romantic love was a neurosis shared by two, a
> > supreme
> >> foolishness. I no longer think that. There's nothing foolish in
> > loving
> >> anyone.  Thinking you'll be loved in return is what's foolish."
> >>       --Rita Mae Brown
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>   --
>   Don't anthropomorphize computers.
>   They hate that.
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>






ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to