I'm sorry, I cannot answer a question when I do not fully understand it. Define "justly" in a way that makes sense in context to both of us, and I'll gladly answer.
j On Mar 27, 2006, at 9:14 PM, Terry L Parker wrote: > Jim, ball's in YOUR court, as it is YOU that challenged the > need for a 'physical aggression truce' (if I got you right) > > Over what do you advocate INITIATING, or doing a credible > threat to initiate, physical force against an innocent person > and/or their justly held possession? > > Do you really not understand this question? > > -Terry Liberty Parker > http://group.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian > > > > --- In [email protected], Jim Syler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Alright, sorry, I didn't realize you were questioning my > questioning of >> the NAP when you wrote this in an earlier post. Your writing style > is a >> bit difficult for me to follow sometimes. Probably because I'm >> stoooopid. >> >> Anyway, you raise a valid point. Before I answer, I'd like some >> clarification: What does "justly" mean here? I'd prefer that you > not >> use a dictionary definition, if possible; I need a philosophical > one. >> What does the word mean to ~you~ in this context? >> >> j >> >> On Mar 27, 2006, at 8:39 PM, Terry L Parker wrote: >> >>> Jim, over what would you want to INITIATE, or do a credible >>> threat to initiate, physical force upon an innocent person >>> or their justly held possession? >>> >>> -Terry Liberty Parker >>> please see what I wrote in >>> What 'Justifies' IINITIATING Physical Force? >>> at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/30715 >>> >>> >>> --- In [email protected], Jim Syler <Calion@> wrote: >>>> >>>> This is precisely about libertarianism pro or con, in particular >>> con to >>>> the narrow, rigid, "NAP" definition of libertarianism, and how >>> stumped >>>> people who hold this view are when you ask them certain > questions. >>>> >>>> On Mar 27, 2006, at 7:19 PM, Terry L Parker wrote: >>>> >>>>> Jim, if you're looking for an answer to the question of what >>>>> label to put on someone you're in the wrong forum. >>>>> >>>>> If you want to explore ideas, actions, issues, positions and >>>>> so on regarding LIBERTARIANISM pro and/or con, this forum is >>>>> an appropriate one. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -Terry Liberty Parker >>>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --- In [email protected], Jim Syler <Calion@> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mar 27, 2006, at 3:31 PM, steven linnabary wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you want to restrict libertarianism to just the purists, >>> than >>>>> what >>>>>>>> label do you give to advocacies of partial libertarianism; >>>>>>>> basically inconsistent fiscally conservative yet socially >>>>> tolerant? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not at all, Eric. ANYBODY can proclaim themselves > libertarian. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But LEADERSHIP positions, including (especially) major >>> candidates >>>>> MUST >>>>>>> be >>>>>>> purist. Otherwise, an ideological party will just become >>> another >>>>>>> "common >>>>>>> carrier" party such as the democrats and republicans. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They hate this question. Puts them in a corner. Forces them >>> to >>>>>>>> admit that deep down they are advocating exclusivity. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Leadership, by definition, is exclusive. >>>>>> >>>>>> I notice you haven't answered the question. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> "I used to think romantic love was a neurosis shared by two, a >>>>> supreme >>>>>> foolishness. I no longer think that. There's nothing foolish in >>>>> loving >>>>>> anyone. Thinking you'll be loved in return is what's foolish." >>>>>> --Rita Mae Brown >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian >>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Don't anthropomorphize computers. >>>> They hate that. >>>> >>>> >>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian >>> Yahoo! Groups Links >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> -- >> "If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier...just > as >> long as I'm the dictator..." >> --George W. Bush, Dec 18, 2000, during his first trip to Washington > as >> President-Elect >> >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> > > > > > > > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > -- "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither Liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
