The general consensus I've been hearing (and agree with) is that if it 
IS Hillary vs. Rice, we should run a man, just to get that percentage 
of the electorate that won't vote for a woman.

j

On Mar 27, 2006, at 10:14 PM, David Macko wrote:

> Alternate parties which cease to run presidential candidates
> soon cease to exist. Mary Ruwart would be the best president
> in at least 150 years but we should avoid the appearance of pandering
> if Hell-ary Rod-DAMN Clinton (Phonetic spelling) or CFR Condoleezza
> (I didn't know that you could turn airplanes into bombs) Rice become
> candidates in 2008.
>
> For life and liberty,
> David Macko
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Terry L Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 10:56 PM
> Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Digest Number 3023
>
>
>> Mary Ruwart is a great choice!
>>
>> -TLP
>>
>> --- In [email protected], "terry12622000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dr. Ruwart, I think would be a good choice if the LP must run
>> someone
>>> for president. I think it is   wasteful running someone for
>> president
>>> and sends the wrong idea about the importance of the office but it
>>> seems most libertarians feel the LP must run someone for office, so
>> i
>>> they do run a Libertarian, not A classic Liberal, not a
>> conservative
>>> either of the old type or the neo type, and not a neoliberal. Mary
>>> Ruwart from what I gather is a real libertarian  not someone
>>> pretending like they
>>> are.
>>>    I change my nomanation, Jesse Walker probally doesn't vote
>> anyway
>>> so he probally will not run for
>>> office.
>>>       I nominate Mary
>>> Ruwart.
>>>      I think we have a  first and a second, all those in favor of
>>> running Mary Ruwart,( who will not water down the LP platform and
>>> will honor her membership pledge) write  aye.--- In
>>> [email protected], marc guttman <marc_guttman@> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Libertarian Party 2008 Presidential Poll
>>>>
>>>> Do you support the Libertarian Party nominating a Celebrity or
>> high-
>>> profile public officeholder for President in 2008?
>>>>
>>>>    Yes
>>>> If yes, who would be your first choice:
>>>> 6. Economist Walter Williams
>>>> Would you rather see the Libertarian Party nominate a minor
>>> celebrity or public officeholder who has much stronger ties to the
>>> Libertarian Party?
>>>>    Yes
>>>> Would you prefer that the Libertarian Party nominate a non-
>>> celebrity candidate or someone who has never held public office
>>> before who is a trusted Party insider?
>>>>    Yes
>>>> If so, which of the following individuals would you prefer the
>> most?
>>>> 7. Mary Ruwart - TX
>>>> Would you consider voting for a Republican if the Libertarian
>> Party
>>> fails to nominate a top-level candidate for President in 2008?
>>>>    No.
>
>
>
> ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- 
ÒWindows and MacOS are products, contrived by engineers in the service 
of speciÞc companies. Unix, by contrast, is not so much a product as it 
is a painstakingly compiled oral history of the hacker subculture.Ó
  Ñ Neil Stephenson



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to