Jon, I'm not ignoring you, had competition for my attention; 
in fact you even know her  :)  

It may be Monday afternoon before I can get back to thi 
conversation, but that should not prevent anyone else from 
chiming in, be they so inclined.    

Right now, I have some more prep to do for tonight's call-in 
TV show on the immigration issue; more show infor at 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TerryLiberty/message/249  


-TLP  



--- In [email protected], Jon Roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I will explain further what I mean about social components with a 
> metaphor: baking a cake. Now I am not a cook, so I may get some 
details 
> wrong, but I used to watch my grandmother and mother do it, so I 
have 
> some idea about how it is done. There are several ingredients: 
flour, 
> eggs, sugar, flavoring, coloring, spices, baking soda (which works 
like 
> yeast in making bread), etc. You have to put these ingredients 
together 
> in a certain order, and blend them in a certain way, and wait a 
certain 
> amount of time (for rising), and put it in the right kind of pan, 
and 
> glaze it with something like sugar to retain the moisture, and heat 
it 
> to certain temperatures for certain periods of time. All of this 
has to 
> be done just right, or the result will be a disaster.
> Societies are like a cake. Can't make them of only one ingredient, 
or in 
> one simple step. A touch of love. Some education. The right amount 
of 
> the right kind of discipline. An external threat, perhaps. 
Cultivation 
> of a sense of duty. Just the right measure of some penalties 
(coercion). 
> If you do enough of the right things in the right order for almost 
> everyone, you will get an overwhelming majority who live in 
harmony, and 
> who internalize their sense of duty as a bonding experience they 
come to 
> experience as love. But you need a measure of coercion in there to 
get 
> things started, to "prime the pump" as it were. You keep the threat 
of 
> coercion in the background to reinforce the common sense of duty, 
> because humans are funny about abandoning their duty or even their 
love 
> if anyone is allowed to "get away" without doing his part. That is 
why 
> the IRS can enforce unconstitutional tax rules. Even jurors who 
know the 
> rules are unlawful may still convict someone for failing to file 
and pay 
> his "taxes" because it is perceived as "getting away" with doing 
what 
> they were all required to do, even if they only yielded to unlawful 
> coercion in doing. It's a herd thing. No coercion in the 
background, 
> even if it is almost never applied, and the whole thing can fall 
apart.
> So don't think in simple Pavlovian terms of direct, active 
coercion. In 
> a real society it is much more complicated than that. A touch of 
> coercion, properly applied, neither too much nor too little, can 
drive 
> the process by which people acquire a sense of duty, then 
internalize 
> that sense into bonding that comes to be experienced as love.
> And all that also serves to encourage people to be just to one 
another, 
> to discourage violations of rights, and thereby reduce the need for 
> courts to intervene, and if they do, to make them more efficient, 
and 
> their decisions more accepted. Dysfunctional justice systems are a 
> symptom of dysfunctional societies, and there may be no way to fix 
the 
> justice systems without fixing the society. On the other hand, 
feedback 
> being what it is, there may be no way to fix the societies without 
> fixing their justice systems. A complete repair will therefore 
involve 
> fixing both in tandem.
> 
> Terry L Parker wrote:
> 
> >Jon, if you don't think that there's enough love manifesting 
> >in the world, stop re-defining opportunities for its expression 
> >as 'duties'   :)  
> >
> >Despite my being born and bred in NEW YORK CITY ('git a rope') 
> >I have a lot more faith in people's 'love' capacity then you 
> >apparently.  You went back DECADES to find that one example 
> >of not enought love in my home town (NYC).  You ignored the 
> >day in day out counter examples.  Most will never be 'famous' 
> >but some are: Bernard Getz being one.  Remember, the subway 
> >guy with a gun who 'terrorized' thugs.  
> >
> >Of cours the fear driven statists in my home town of NYC came 
> >down on him very hard; remember?  
> >
> >A common feeling when pan-handled by strangers on the street 
> >in NYC is that one has already given enough through the power 
> >of govt coerced obligation.  That belief that 'people are no 
> >damn good' so us elites will have to physically force them to 
> >'do right'  Even sounds pathetic when ya say it that way.  :(  
> >
> >Coercing obligatory acts that should have been the province of 
> >IDEALISTIC 'love' (not just personal sentimentality) are 
> >destructive to society.  Driven by, imo, exagerated fear that 
> >'people are no damn good' a policy of employing govt to force 
> >what should have been done out of genuine caring, DISPLACES 
> >the responses of natural caring.  (btw,same arguments are made 
> >regarding other things 'wanted' as 'rights')  
> >
> >But, despite this destructive influence via coerced caring, 
> >during 911 the were MANY 'above and beyond duty' responses by 
> >New Yorkers; even to the point of death (included a libertarian 
> >hero too)  There are more examples but I'm not sure that you 
> >and I can agree about current human nature, Jon.  
> >
> >I will say this, you and I 'love' the best of American ideals 
> >and no one could make us do the stuff that we do already  :)  
> >
> >
> >-Terry Liberty Parker 
> >
> >'Real world' experiment in LIBERTARIAN community became famous
> >at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/message/2569 
> >
> >'Real World' experiment in LIBERTARIAN nation building
> >at http://www.constitution.org 
> >
> > 
> >  
> >
> 
> -- 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Our efforts depend on donations from people like you. Directions
> for donors are at     http://www.constitution.org/whatucando.htm
> Constitution Society      7793 Burnet Road #37, Austin, TX 78757
> 512/374-9585   www.constitution.org  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>






ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to