Because Eric is a disalusioned Republican? Just a wild conjecture. --- In [email protected], "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you're interested in getting Libertarians elected to public office, > why are you always mentioning non-Libertarians like Schwarzenegger, > McClintock, Miller, Boortz, Ventura, and other Republicans? Why don't > I ever hear you pushing Libertarian Party candidates? > > > > --- In [email protected], "Eric Dondero Rittberg" > <ericdondero@> wrote: > > > > Hell, I don't know. Sounds like some question straight from a panel > > of the Cato Institute on legal foundations of the Constitution, or > > some stuff subject matter like that. > > > > Honestly Mark, I haven't really thought about such stuff. > > > > More interested in tackling useful topics like GETTING LIBERTARIANS > > ELECTED TO PUBLIC OFFICE!!!!!!! > > > > Here's a question for you. How many candidate brochures were you > > able to deliver and how many signs were you able to get up for > > libertarian candidates in the 2004 election cycle? > > > > > > [ ModeratorNote: Eric is discrediting his advocacy by resorting > > to ad hominem ('to the man') in what he thinks is a distraction > > from Mark's appropriate question about Eric's stance. Mark busting > > Eric is very much ON-topic here. I'm allowing Eric's above ad > > hominem (this one time) as a good example of bad forum behavior. > > -TLP ] > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "mark robert" <colowe@> wrote: > > > > > > Eric, > > > > > > > > > > > > I believe you had said a signed pledge is force. I asked what > > > kind of force. I said I thought it sounded like a contract. I > > > asked if you view contracts as aggression. I don't think any of > > > that was too technical or off topic; it was simple and directly > > > responsive to your comments. So, if you don't mind, the questions > > > still stand. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ************ > > > {American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote > > > "not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the > > > case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions. > > > There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a > > > unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill > > > its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and > > > unjust lawsuits. > > > See www.fija.org > > > [Please adopt this as your own signature.] } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure what your question is below? You're getting a bit > > > too > > > technical IMHO. Not quite sure what all this has to do with > > > electing more libertarians to public office? > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "mark robert" <colowe@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Eric, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sounds like some LP groups require a signature and others > > > don't. > > > > Nonetheless, you think it's force. Is it the kind of force that > > > > qualifies as the initiation of aggression (the one that > > > > libertarianism is against)? Or is it the kind of force to which > > > > you agreed to abide when you voluntarily joined this group? To > > > > me, it sounds more like a contract. Do you view consensual > > > > contracts as aggression? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > >
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
