The lack of right-to-work laws also deny freedom, this argument is moot as it is two different idealogical points, that can both be played from a libertarian angle. However, with out facts to back one discission over the other the argument is meaningless. I am not sold on right-to-work at all, and I want to make a decission on it but I need to hear more facts, (not idealogical stands), to make a decission.
PS: It was a Libertarian think tank who put out the report in favor of right to work in Michigan, that started me considering the merrit of right to work at all. --- In [email protected], "hrearden_hr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Cory Nott" <corynott@> wrote: > If anything, right-to-work protects freedom of association by > > allowing them to choose not to be a member of a union and still work > at a > > "union shop." > > > It does not protect freedom because no person has the freedom to work > for a particular employer. Employers have a right to establish the > conditions of employment because they are the creators of jobs. Nobody > has the right to work for an employer without the employer's consent. > Right to work laws deny freedom. > > $ > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
