No, I haven't been reading any US papers for about 6 months Eric. I was in Europe durring the riots to be honest. I'll tell you later were I got my news from.
--- In [email protected], "Eric Dondero Rittberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Because van Gogh was murdered because of one thing; his support for > free speach rights. It'd be like the current President of the ACLU > being murdered in the streets of Washington, DC. Could you imagine > the outcry on that? Same deal with van Gogh, except it happened in > a small country in Western Europe that doesn't get much attention. > > Looks like you're victim of Liberal-press propoganda. Been reading > the NY Times and Newsweek uncoolrabbit? Fact is, the Paris riots > were ALL ABOUT Islamo-Fascism. Just the media hid that fact. > > > > --- In [email protected], "uncoolrabbit" > <uncoolrabbit@> wrote: > > > > Riots in Paris weren't about Islamo-fascism it was about > inequality > > and racism. There are many many murders in the world every day, > why > > do you think Theo Van Gogh should be spoke about when thousands of > > others are not? Why attack "islamo-facism" alone with verbal > assault > > when you can attack all injustice by showing the path to a better > > way? > > > > --- In [email protected], "Eric Dondero Rittberg" > > <ericdondero@> wrote: > > > > > > Good point. So then, why don't we see the Anti-War Libertarians > > > ever attacking Islamo-Fascism? Why the silence from their camp > > > about the murder of Theo van Gogh, the Muslim riots in Paris, > the > > > Muslim guy in the SUV on the UNC campus? > > > > > > Why no solutions from their side as to how we could stop Islamo- > > > Fascism outside of waging war on them? > > > > > > And no, retreat would only encourage them even more. That's not > a > > > solution. > > > > > > What's the Anti-War Libertarian solution to stopping Islamo- > > > Fascism. I'm super curious??? > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "uncoolrabbit" > > > <uncoolrabbit@> wrote: > > > > > > > > The point I would make, wich moved me to respond to the thread > > is > > > > that just as being pro war does not nesesarily go hand and > hand > > > with > > > > pro libertey, being anti war also does not nesasarily mean you > > do > > > > not recognize the dangers of islamic extreemism. It can be as > > > simple > > > > as a different view point on how to best adress that danger > Geof. > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Geof Gibson" > <geofgibson@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "uncoolrabbit" > > > <uncoolrabbit@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > And I see the staunch Bush supporters blinded, by what I > am > > > not > > > > so > > > > > > bold to single out ot one thing, nor do I have time to > list > > > some > > > > of > > > > > > the many possible factors. I will say that the facts are > > that > > > > Bush > > > > > > policy has not resulted in greater protection. I will > argue > > > that > > > > my > > > > > > personal opinion is that Bush policy has decreased > american > > > > > > security, and damaged personal liberties and the american > > > > economy. > > > > > > So go on blind if you desire, both left and right. > Hopefully > > > > > > libertarians will keep there eyes open to tell when you > are > > > > about to > > > > > > walk off a cliff or into a wall. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Good idea to keep our eyes open. And please, don't mistake > my > > > > ability > > > > > to see the threat of Islamofascism as staunch or even > lukewarm > > > > support > > > > > for Bush. Bush is not a conservative and has been a great > > > > > disappointment on many things including the unconscionable > > > > expansion > > > > > of Medicare. I recently read an interesting article by Fred > > > Barnes > > > > > defining Bush as a 'strong government conservative.' I > > believe > > > > this > > > > > to be an accurate descrition but philosophically > inconsistent > > > with > > > > > fundamental principles of conservatism. > > > > > > > > > > You can be of any political philosophy and still identify > the > > > > threat > > > > > of Islamofascism. It is the solutions we advocate which > > > > differentiate > > > > > us. Of course, anyone can deny the threat as well. Only > > > history > > > > will > > > > > be the final judge. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
